Migratory species definition| Biodiversity A-Z (original) (raw)

Contents

  1. Further definitions
  2. Key points
  3. Concept description
  4. Importance of migration
  5. Convention On Migratory Species
  6. Threats
  7. Conservation

Further definitions

Behavioural scientific definition of Migration

Sustained directional movement by an animal that takes it out of one habitat and into another.

Dingle (1996), Migration The Biology of Life on the Move 2

Key points

Concept description

Migratory species can be found in all major groups of animals but take many different forms and can occur in many different environments 3. The Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) is particularly concerned with species of wild animals which cross national jurisdictional boundaries. This focus explains why the CMS definition of ‘migratory species’ involves political boundaries rather than using purely biological criteria. The result of the CMS definition is that species which do not move in a typically migratory fashion, such as gorillas (Gorilla gorilla and Gorilla beringei), are included under Appendix I of the CMS because their otherwise small movement take them across national borders 4. In contrast to the convention, the behavioural definition generally focuses on movement between habitat for a biological purpose. These resulting types of movement do not necessarily fit the CMS definition being described as migration, for example the migration of birds to different altitudes (e.g 5) or the vertical migration of aquatic organisms within a water column 6 because the animals do not always cross international political boarders. The behavioural definition was developed further by Dingle to include a number of concepts including the type of movement; the scale and duration of the activity (in contrast to daily movement); and, the seasonality of the moment to make use of seasonal resources or climate conditions 3.

Importance of migration

Migration is a spatial and temporal type of behaviour that increases the chance of species survival e.g. allowing species to use resources which are only available in a particular window of time thus allowing greater densities of animals to come together over a shorter temporal scale than the habitat would be able to support on a permanent basis. Migratory animals are essentially “part-time” components of ecosystems. Often migratory species also fulfill important seasonal ecological functions. They can connect different areas and perform key ecosystem functions such as pest control 7, seed dispersal 8 and pollination 9. Migration moves energy and matter between ecosystems 10. For example, salmon transfer energy from the marine environment to inland streams when they migrate to spawning areas 11. Migratory species may also exploit seasonally abundant local food resources, thereby contributing to the biological balance of a local ecosystem 12. Many human communities rely on migratory species as a seasonal resource on which to base subsistence, recreational or commercial harvesting activities. These activities often represent a seasonally predictable resource shared by geographically remote communities. They can also serve as a basis for tourism, and therefore are economically important, as seasonal aggregations of species can provide spectacular visual sights 12.

Convention On Migratory Species

The UN, during the 1972 Conference on the Human Environment, recognised the difficulty in protecting species which move across political boundaries. This triggered the German government, working with IUCN’s Environmental Law Centre, to develop the text for the Convention on Migratory Species which was signed in 1979 and came into force in 1983 13. The aim of the CMS is to conserve terrestrial, aquatic and avian migratory species throughout their range through international cooperation. Migratory species which are threatened with extinction are listed on Appendix I of the Convention, while other species that require international cooperation are listed on Appendix II. The CMS currently has 119 Parties (mostly governments). In addition, some countries have signed Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) with The Convention despite not being a Party. The MoUs and Agreements, conducted under the auspices of the CMS, generally focus on particular geographic areas and species (e.g. Agreement on African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds -AEWA-, MoU on the Saiga Antelope). In the case of the gorillas, there were ten range states included in the negotiation of the Gorilla Agreement (2008) under the auspices of the CMS to help in their protection 14. The CMS has a Memoranda of Cooperation with the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) which provides a formal communication and coordination process between these bodies. “While CBD focuses on the maintenance of biological diversity on genetic, species and ecosystem levels, CMS uses migratory species as a “living thread” to link ecosystems functionally through networks, corridors and pathways over large geographic areas, cutting across national, regional and continental boundaries.” 12 The CMS also has a joint work programme with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) which aims to increase the synergies between the two Conventions where there are overlapping interests, such as trade controls of migratory species 15. In addition to the CMS, there are other global agreements which identify migratory species such as the Ramsar Convention which cooperates on migratory bird issues, including flyway policies, with CMS 16 and an agreement under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which focuses on highly migratory fish stocks 17.

Threats

Many migratory species, particularly long-distance migrants, are recognised as suffering serious population declines 18. There are a number of specific threats faced by species which migrate directly linked to their migratory behaviour. Their mobile nature mean migratory species are often exposed to a potentially wide array of threats across their range such as habitat destruction to key staging sites (resting and feeding areas), hunting and overexploitation at sites where they gather in large numbers, and the impacts of climate change. The rate of climate change may vary in different areas of habitat used by migratory species making it particularly hard for species to adapt and often leading to phenological (timing) mismatches 19. The main driver of terrestrial migratory mammal extinctions is considered to be habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation. Following this, unsustainable harvesting is identified as a major threat to many CMS listed species 20. In the marine realm, similar threats (such as over-harvesting, habitat loss, pollution and climate change) are encountered 21.

Conservation

Specific conservation strategies exist for certain migratory species, focused on identifying key sites along migration routes for protection, or highlighting important migration paths, such as particular flyways. Traditional conservation measures such as protected areas can be effective for migratory species if they target these key staging sites along a migration path. The importance of sites for the survival of migratory species is recognised through their incorporation into criteria for designations of important biodiversity areas, such as BirdLife’s Important Bird Areas (IBAs) 22 and IFC’s Critical Habitat 23.

References & Websites

  1. Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (1979) Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Convention on Migratory Species Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Dingle DH (1996) Migration The Biology of Life on the Move. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
  3. Dingle H, Drake VA (2007) What Is Migration? Bioscience 57:113–121
  4. CMS Secretariat (2012) Appendices I and II of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species, Geneva, Switzerland
  5. Boyle WA, Norris DR, Guglielmo CG (2010) Storms drive altitudinal migration in a tropical bird. Proc Biol Sci 277:2511–9
  6. Stich H-B, Lampert W (1981) Predator evasion as an explanation of diurnal vertical migration by zooplankton. Nature 293:396–398
  7. Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, Macvean C (2000) The Impact of Avian Insectovory on Arthropods and Leaf Damage in Some Guatemalan coffee plantations. Ecology 81:1750–1755
  8. Claudia A, David M, James H, Michael W (2008) Seed dispersal by Bison bison in a tallgrass prairie. J Veg Sci 19:769–778
  9. Lopez-Hoffman L, Varady RG, Flessa KW, Balvanera P (2010) Ecosystem services across borders: a framework for transboundary conservation policy. Front Ecol Environ 8:84–91
  10. Reynolds HL, Clay K (2011) Migratory species and ecological processes. Environ Law 41:371–391
  11. Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Schindler DE, Helfield JM (2002) Pacific Salmon, Nutrients, and the Dynamics of Freshwater and Riparian Ecosystems. Ecosystems 5:399–417
  12. CMS Secretariat (2011) Updated Strategic Plan. Document 2006-2014.UNEP/CMS/Conf. 10.22/Rev.1. Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species, Bergen, Norway
  13. CMS Secretariat (2011) CMS History and Structure From Stockholm to Bonn CMS History and Structure UNEP Milestones. CMS & UNEP, Bonn, Germany
  14. CMS Secretariat (2004) CMS agreement on the conservation of Gorillas and their habitat. http://www.cms.int/species/gorillas/index.htm. Accessed 30 Jul 2013
  15. CMS Secretariat & CITES Secretariat (2011) CMS CITES Joint work programme 2012-2014. Secretarait of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora & Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species, Bergen, Norway
  16. Ramsar Secretariat (2012) Ramsar COP11 DOC 19 Cooperation between the Ramsar Convention and the Convention on Migratory Species Ramsar-CMS Joint Work Plan 2012-2014. Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention, Bucharest, Romania
  17. UN (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. United Nations General Assembly, New York, US
  18. Sanderson FJ, Donald PF, Pain DJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ (2006) Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds. Biol Conserv 131:93–105
  19. Both C, Van Turnhout C a M, Bijlsma RG, Siepel H, Van Strien AJ, Foppen RPB (2010) Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats. Proc Biol Sci 277:1259–66
  20. CMS Secretariat (2011) Review of CMS existing instruments and projects on terrestrial mammals (including bats). Document UNEP/CMS/Inf.10.15. Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species, Bergen, Norway
  21. CMS Secretariat (2011) Review of CMS existing instruments and projects on marine turtles. Document UNEP/CMS/Inf.10.16. Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species, Bergen, Norway
  22. Birdlife International (2008) Global IBA Criteria. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/ibacritglob. Accessed 10 Jul 2013
  23. IFC (2012) Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources. International Finance Corporation, Washington DC, U.S.A

Download Download this factsheet as a PDF