msg150261 - (view) |
Author: Inada Naoki (methane) *  |
Date: 2011-12-26 12:50 |
I am one of Japanese translate of Python documents. We have done translating Python 2.7 document and will start translating Python 3.2 or 3.3. I want to use sphinx-i18n and pootle to translate. But http://pootle.python.org/ is very outdated. Anyone can update the site? If nobody maintain the site, could I create Python Document project at http://pootle.locamotion.org/ ? |
|
|
msg150380 - (view) |
Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2011-12-30 15:01 |
I'd rather have you maintain poodle.python.org instead of maintaining Python translations off-site. |
|
|
msg150416 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *  |
Date: 2011-12-31 11:26 |
Agreed with Martin. I would be nice to get a statement on the status of pootle.python.org (social aspects like updating and publishing the translations + organization of teams), but Georg seems busy. (This would probably be more at home on a mailing list rather than in the CPython bug tracker.) |
|
|
msg150417 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *  |
Date: 2011-12-31 11:43 |
I've never really had a hand in pootle.python.org; it was set up by Martin and Robert Lehmann, and Sandro Tosi also wanted to lend a hand... |
|
|
msg150418 - (view) |
Author: Sandro Tosi (sandro.tosi) *  |
Date: 2011-12-31 11:49 |
Yeah, I really would like to help with pootle, but it seems we don't have a current status of the thing + a roadmap to where we want to go. From the top of my head, I think we need at least: - the current setup of the machine/service - updated packages for pootle + its deps (it should be a debian machine, so I can leverage my DD status to help here) - plan the migration from the current pootle to the updated one - start advertise pootle, which is much better than having a lot of people translating python doc on their own websites instead of a central (official) place - maybe rename the service? |
|
|
msg150420 - (view) |
Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2011-12-31 14:31 |
naoki: what is your actual complaint about the installation being outdated? Are you referring to the message catalog (documentation version), or the software? As for the message catalog, I don't think it should be updated too often (only once per Python release), otherwise, translators will have to fight a moving target (which they will have to, anyway, given that the documentation evolves). Whatever updating procedure is performed: preserving the existing translations and the existing accounts is an absolute must. I'm not sure what good renaming the service would do; this sounds like bike shedding. |
|
|
msg150422 - (view) |
Author: Inada Naoki (methane) *  |
Date: 2011-12-31 16:33 |
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > > naoki: what is your actual complaint about the installation being outdated? Are you referring to the message catalog (documentation version), or the software? I need Python 3.2's message catalog. But updating pootle version is also nice to me. > As for the message catalog, I don't think it should be updated too often (only once per Python release), otherwise, translators will have to fight a moving target (which they will have to, anyway, given that the documentation evolves). > I agree with you about already released series (~3.2). I think updating message catalog for beta versions may help releasing new Python's translated document fast. The way to manage multiple series is also needed when Python 3.3 is released. |
|
|
msg211321 - (view) |
Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2014-02-16 15:34 |
pootle.python.org has been disabled. |
|
|