Issue 13981: time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available (original) (raw)

Issue13981

Created on 2012-02-09 23:00 by vstinner, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (2)
msg153000 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2012-02-09 23:00
With the PEP 410, it is possible to store timestamps with a resolution of 1 nanosecond. Python should use nanosleep() if the function is available for time.sleep(). This issue depends on issue #13882.
msg154804 - (view) Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * (Python committer) Date: 2012-03-02 21:40
The PEP 410 has been rejected, so I close the issue.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:57:26 admin set github: 58189
2012-03-02 21:40:58 vstinner set status: open -> closedresolution: wont fixmessages: +
2012-02-11 04:27:28 Arfrever set nosy: + Arfrever
2012-02-10 03:50:25 rosslagerwall set nosy: + rosslagerwall
2012-02-09 23:00:37 vstinner set dependencies: + PEP 410: Use decimal.Decimal type for timestamps
2012-02-09 23:00:33 vstinner create