Issue 13981: time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available (original) (raw)
Issue13981
Created on 2012-02-09 23:00 by vstinner, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (2) | ||
---|---|---|
msg153000 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2012-02-09 23:00 |
With the PEP 410, it is possible to store timestamps with a resolution of 1 nanosecond. Python should use nanosleep() if the function is available for time.sleep(). This issue depends on issue #13882. | ||
msg154804 - (view) | Author: STINNER Victor (vstinner) * ![]() |
Date: 2012-03-02 21:40 |
The PEP 410 has been rejected, so I close the issue. |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:57:26 | admin | set | github: 58189 |
2012-03-02 21:40:58 | vstinner | set | status: open -> closedresolution: wont fixmessages: + |
2012-02-11 04:27:28 | Arfrever | set | nosy: + Arfrever |
2012-02-10 03:50:25 | rosslagerwall | set | nosy: + rosslagerwall |
2012-02-09 23:00:37 | vstinner | set | dependencies: + PEP 410: Use decimal.Decimal type for timestamps |
2012-02-09 23:00:33 | vstinner | create |