original ) (raw )Created on 2012-02-23 14:58 by tshepang , last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin . This issue is now closed .
Messages (5)
msg154065 - (view) Author: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe (tshepang) *
Date: 2012-02-23 14:58
I wonder if this note was hidden deliberately.
msg154068 - (view) Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) *
Date: 2012-02-23 15:45
Well, presumably the XXX tells you why it's hidden.
msg154109 - (view) Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *
Date: 2012-02-24 04:39
Agreed with Antoine. If you want, you can make a patch for the PEPs repo with the info requested by the XXX note, then a patch to replace that note by a link to the PEP, unless Martin wanted to do that himself.
msg154124 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *
Date: 2012-02-24 09:23
I'll look into this shortly.
msg155007 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *
Date: 2012-03-06 07:44
This is now fixed with d916145b20c3 .
History
Date
User
Action
Args
2022-04-11 14:57:27
admin
set
github: 58308
2012-03-06 07:44:57
loewis
set
status: open -> closedresolution: fixedmessages: +
2012-02-24 09:23:06
loewis
set
messages: +
2012-02-24 04:39:05
eric.araujo
set
nosy: + eric.araujo messages: + title: expose a hidden note -> Add a missing info to PEP 393 + link from whatsnew 3.3
2012-02-23 15:45:33
pitrou
set
nosy: + loewis messages: +
2012-02-23 15:30:23
tshepang
set
title: expose a note a hidden note -> expose a hidden note
2012-02-23 15:01:37
ezio.melotti
set
nosy: + pitrou , vstinner type: enhancementstage: patch review
2012-02-23 14:58:10
tshepang
create
