process
Status: |
closed |
Resolution: |
fixed |
Dependencies: |
|
Superseder: |
|
Assigned To: |
|
Nosy List: |
BreamoreBoy, docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, python-dev, telephonebook, tshepang, v+python |
Priority: |
normal |
Keywords: |
|
Created on 2012-02-25 20:48 by telephonebook, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (6) |
|
|
msg154283 - (view) |
Author: Christine Jones (telephonebook) |
Date: 2012-02-25 20:48 |
Change to this http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/stdtypes.html as suggested by Nick Coghlan here http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/969817 "The formatting operations described here are modelled on C's printf() syntax. They only support formatting of certain builtin types, and the use of a binary operator means that care may be needed in order to format tuples and dictionaries correctly. As the new string formatting syntax is more powerful, flexible, extensible and handles tuples and dictionaries naturally, it is recommended for new code. However, there are no current plans to deprecate printf-style formatting." |
|
|
msg154294 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *  |
Date: 2012-02-26 02:34 |
I’d like to make a patch with Nick’s text and a few examples. |
|
|
msg154320 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2012-02-26 09:54 |
New changeset 80069bbae26d by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2': Issue #14123: Explicitly mention that old style % string formatting has caveats http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/80069bbae26d New changeset 98a1855ebfe1 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default': Issue #14123: Explicitly mention that old style % string formatting has caveats but is not going away any time soon. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/98a1855ebfe1 |
|
|
msg154445 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *  |
Date: 2012-02-27 09:06 |
Apparently this was too urgent too wait for my patch :) Not closing yet, as there are still phrasing issues discussed on python-dev. |
|
|
msg183389 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2013-03-03 17:04 |
I can't see too much sense in leaving this open, what are your opinions? |
|
|
msg183476 - (view) |
Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti) *  |
Date: 2013-03-04 16:49 |
The only issue seems about the use of the word "deprecate", but I think it's fine, so I'll close this issue. |
|
|
History |
|
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-04-11 14:57:27 |
admin |
set |
github: 58331 |
2013-03-04 16:49:07 |
ezio.melotti |
set |
status: open -> closedresolution: fixedmessages: + |
2013-03-03 17:04:21 |
BreamoreBoy |
set |
nosy: + BreamoreBoymessages: + |
2012-02-27 09:40:55 |
ezio.melotti |
set |
nosy: + ezio.melottitype: enhancementstage: needs patch -> resolved |
2012-02-27 09:06:04 |
eric.araujo |
set |
assignee: eric.araujo -> messages: + nosy: + gregory.p.smith |
2012-02-26 09:54:56 |
python-dev |
set |
nosy: + python-devmessages: + |
2012-02-26 02:34:47 |
eric.araujo |
set |
versions: + Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3nosy: + eric.araujo, ncoghlanmessages: + assignee: docs@python -> eric.araujostage: needs patch |
2012-02-26 00:03:53 |
tshepang |
set |
title: Doc change re old and new string formatting -> Indicate that there are no current plans to deprecate printf-style formatting |
2012-02-25 23:49:46 |
tshepang |
set |
nosy: + tshepang |
2012-02-25 21:09:41 |
v+python |
set |
nosy: + v+python |
2012-02-25 21:04:24 |
eric.smith |
set |
nosy: + eric.smith |
2012-02-25 20:48:48 |
telephonebook |
create |
|