msg29667 - (view) |
Author: Václav Haisman (wilx) |
Date: 2006-08-24 09:49 |
Hi, I think there is a bug arraymodule.c this line: {"__deepcopy__",(PyCFunction)array_copy, METH_NOARGS, copy_doc}, should probably have METH_O instead of METH_NOARGS there, since according to docs and the prototype of the array_copy() function there is one parameter. |
|
|
msg29668 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) *  |
Date: 2006-08-24 18:50 |
Logged In: YES user_id=34209 Thanks! Fixed in the trunk (which is 2.6-to-be) revision 51565, and it will also be fixed for Python 2.4.4 and 2.5.1. It's unfortunately just a bit too late for 2.5.0. |
|
|
msg29669 - (view) |
Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) *  |
Date: 2006-08-28 13:32 |
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 Should this be fixed in the release candidate? |
|
|
msg29670 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) *  |
Date: 2006-08-29 07:35 |
Logged In: YES user_id=34209 Not unless you want another release candidate. copy.deepcopy has never worked on array instances, so it's not a release-preventing bug (but each bugfix may *add* a release-preventing bug by accident :) |
|
|
msg29671 - (view) |
Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2006-12-28 07:59 |
Thomas, was there any reason this wasn't checked in to 2.5? I'm guessing it was just forgotten. I don't see any mention in Misc/NEWS either. |
|
|
msg29672 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) *  |
Date: 2006-12-28 09:11 |
The 2.5 branch at the time was still pre-2.5.0, and we didn't want to make this change between release candidate and release. It's safe to be checked into release25-maint now. I'll do it sometime tonight. |
|
|
msg29673 - (view) |
Author: Thomas Wouters (twouters) *  |
Date: 2006-12-29 15:05 |
Backported. |
|
|
msg29674 - (view) |
Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2007-01-06 21:19 |
Thomas, was there any reason this wasn't checked in to 2.5? I'm guessing it was just forgotten. I don't see any mention in Misc/NEWS either. |
|
|
msg29675 - (view) |
Author: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz) *  |
Date: 2007-01-06 21:21 |
Stupid SF. |
|
|