Issue1618455
Created on 2006-12-18 23:12 by bmaurer, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Files |
|
|
|
File name |
Uploaded |
Description |
Edit |
py.patch |
bmaurer,2006-12-18 23:12 |
patch |
|
Messages (3) |
|
|
msg30827 - (view) |
Author: Ben Maurer (bmaurer) |
Date: 2006-12-18 23:12 |
The attached patch increases the performance of HMAC by a factor of 6. It does so by avoiding useing join/map in the strxor and using a lookup table. It would be faster just to do xor at the string level, but it's not clear that can be done without help from C. |
|
|
msg30828 - (view) |
Author: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling) *  |
Date: 2006-12-19 14:16 |
Thanks for your patch; I've modified it to remove _strxor() completely and applied the change as rev. 53065. When I tried a trivial benchmark, the speed improvement wasn't anywhere near 6X, and was more like 7%. The patch is still worth applying because it also simplifies the code. |
|
|
msg30829 - (view) |
Author: Ben Maurer (bmaurer) |
Date: 2006-12-19 14:58 |
The performance increase is if you call hmac.new a lot. I did a benchmark on a relatively small amount of cleartext (50 bytes). This was actually something I needed to use. One thing I found -- reusing teh same hmac option helps *ALOT* the hmac docs don't make it clear how much this will help. |
|
|
History |
|
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2022-04-11 14:56:21 |
admin |
set |
github: 44359 |
2006-12-18 23:12:40 |
bmaurer |
create |
|