Issue 16746: clarify what should be sent to peps@ (original) (raw)

Created on 2012-12-21 21:27 by chris.jerdonek, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)

msg177897 - (view)

Author: Chris Jerdonek (chris.jerdonek) * (Python committer)

Date: 2012-12-21 21:27

Currently, PEP 1 can be read to mean that <peps@python.org> should be CC'ed on all e-mails related to PEPs. However, this isn't the intent because, for example, it is okay to have discussions about PEPs on python-dev or python-ideas without involving <peps@python.org>.

I'm attaching a patch to clarify this language.

[This issue is from: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123251.html ]

msg177905 - (view)

Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * (Python committer)

Date: 2012-12-21 22:53

The editors do more than your sentence suggests. They also (sometimes) edit peps, (sometimes) provide advice about preparing one, and commit and update peps when the author(s) do not have commit access.

The distinction in the types of email that PEP 1 is attempting to make is the distinction between public discussions of the PEP (which go to python-dev or python-ideas) and semi-private discussions about the mechanics of preparing and posting and updating PEPs, which should go to all the pep editors (thus the instruction to cc the list).

In other words, if you want non-editors involved in the discussion, post to python-dev or whatnot, and do not CC the PEP editors. All other PEP matters should go to the PEP editors, and not be CCed to any other list.

That's what the original text says, but admittedly you have to parse it like a computer would to understand that :)

msg177939 - (view)

Author: Chris Jerdonek (chris.jerdonek) * (Python committer)

Date: 2012-12-22 12:42

This issue was just addressed by Nick's fix for issue 16581, specifically the following parts of http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/24d5623ab21e :

A PEP editor must subscribe to the <peps@python.org> list. All -PEP-related correspondence should be sent (or CC'd) to +correspondence related to PEP administration should be sent (or forwarded) to <peps@python.org> (but please do not cross-post!).

msg177940 - (view)

Author: Chris Jerdonek (chris.jerdonek) * (Python committer)

Date: 2012-12-22 12:49

By the way, thanks for the clarifying info, David. Also, I thought I was the one that was going to be accused of reading the original text like a computer. :)

History

Date

User

Action

Args

2022-04-11 14:57:39

admin

set

github: 60950

2012-12-22 12:49:15

chris.jerdonek

set

messages: +

2012-12-22 12:42:55

chris.jerdonek

set

status: open -> closed

nosy: + ncoghlan
messages: +

resolution: fixed
stage: resolved

2012-12-21 22:53:06

r.david.murray

set

priority: low -> normal

nosy: + r.david.murray
messages: +

assignee: brett.cannon ->
stage: patch review -> (no value)

2012-12-21 22:50:31

brett.cannon

set

priority: normal -> low
assignee: brett.cannon

nosy: + brett.cannon
stage: patch review

2012-12-21 21:29:35

chris.jerdonek

set

files: + issue-16746-1.patch
keywords: + patch

2012-12-21 21:27:03

chris.jerdonek

create