| msg208062 - (view) |
Author: Ryan Smith-Roberts (rmsr) * |
Date: 2014-01-14 00:43 |
| recvfrom_into fails to check that the supplied buffer object is big enough for the requested read and so will happily write off the end. I will attach patches for 3.4 and 2.7, I'm not familiar with the backporting procedure to go further but all versions since 2.5 have this bug and while very highly unlikely it's technically remotely exploitable. Quickie trigger script, crash on interpreter exit: --------- BEGIN SEGFAULT --------- import socket r, w = socket.socketpair() w.send(b'X' * 1024) r.recvfrom_into(bytearray(), 1024) |
|
|
| msg208066 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) *  |
Date: 2014-01-14 02:35 |
| Everything before 2.7 is already out of even security maintenance, so you've already checked off everything it will get fixed in. |
|
|
| msg208070 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev)  |
Date: 2014-01-14 04:15 |
| New changeset 87673659d8f7 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '2.7': complain when nbytes > buflen to fix possible buffer overflow (closes #20246) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/87673659d8f7 New changeset 715fd3d8ac93 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.1': complain when nbytes > buflen to fix possible buffer overflow (closes #20246) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/715fd3d8ac93 New changeset 9c56217e5c79 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.2': complain when nbytes > buflen to fix possible buffer overflow (closes #20246) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9c56217e5c79 New changeset 7f176a45211f by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.3': merge 3.2 (#20246) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7f176a45211f New changeset ead74e54d68f by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': merge 3.3 (#20246) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ead74e54d68f New changeset 37ed85008f51 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default': merge 3.3 (#20246) http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/37ed85008f51 |
|
|
| msg208422 - (view) |
Author: Stefan Krah (skrah) * |
Date: 2014-01-18 23:05 |
| One test fails on FreeBSD 9.0 and 6.4: ====================================================================== ERROR: testRecvFromIntoSmallBuffer (test.test_socket.BufferIOTest) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/home/db3l/buildarea/3.x.bolen-freebsd/build/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line 259, in _tearDown raise exc File "/usr/home/db3l/buildarea/3.x.bolen-freebsd/build/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line 271, in clientRun test_func() File "/usr/home/db3l/buildarea/3.x.bolen-freebsd/build/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line 4690, in _testRecvFromIntoSmallBuffer self.serv_conn.send(MSG*2048) BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe |
|
|
| msg208428 - (view) |
Author: Ryan Smith-Roberts (rmsr) * |
Date: 2014-01-19 00:55 |
| Perhaps the test is sending an infeasibly large message. If you remove the '*2048' does it pass? (I set up a FreeBSD 9.2 amd64 VM but all tests are passing here). |
|
|
| msg208501 - (view) |
Author: Stefan Krah (skrah) * |
Date: 2014-01-19 21:33 |
| MSG*1024 passes. I did not look at this issue: Would changing the value to 1024 invalidate the test? |
|
|
| msg208580 - (view) |
Author: Ryan Smith-Roberts (rmsr) * |
Date: 2014-01-20 20:46 |
| The send part of the test doesn't matter, since what's being tested happens before any reads. The MSG multiplier should be removed completely, since none of the other tests do that. Patch attached. |
|
|
| msg208711 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) |
Date: 2014-01-21 22:07 |
| New changeset 5c4f4db8107c by Stefan Krah in branch '3.3': Issue #20246: Fix test failures on FreeBSD. Patch by Ryan Smith-Roberts. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5c4f4db8107c New changeset 9bbc3cc8ff4c by Stefan Krah in branch 'default': Issue #20246: Fix test failures on FreeBSD. Patch by Ryan Smith-Roberts. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9bbc3cc8ff4c New changeset b6c5a37b221f by Stefan Krah in branch '2.7': Issue #20246: Fix test failures on FreeBSD. Patch by Ryan Smith-Roberts. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b6c5a37b221f |
|
|
| msg208712 - (view) |
Author: Stefan Krah (skrah) * |
Date: 2014-01-21 22:11 |
| Thanks Ryan. As you say, the original segfault is also triggered with the shortened message. |
|
|
| msg212165 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 07:23 |
| I just came across https://www.trustedsec.com/february-2014/python-remote-code-execution-socket-recvfrom_into/ . Now I wonder why this bug was neither reported to PSRT nor get a CVE number. It's a buffer overflow... I'm going to contact MITRE right away. |
|
|
| msg212166 - (view) |
Author: Alyssa Coghlan (ncoghlan) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 07:43 |
| Branch status: Vulnerable (last release prior to patch): 2.7.6 3.1.5 3.2.5 Fixed (latest release post patch): 3.3.4+ 3.4 So my reading is that 2.7.7 needs to be brought forward, and source only releases of 3.1.6 and 3.2.6 should be published. It also sounds like there's a missing trigger that automatically notifies PSRT when someone else classifies a bug as a security bug. |
|
|
| msg212167 - (view) |
Author: Alyssa Coghlan (ncoghlan) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 07:52 |
| Confirming the fix is in the 3.3.4 tag: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/7ff62415e426/Lib/test/test_socket.py#l4539 And the 3.4rc1 tag: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/5e088cea8660/Lib/test/test_socket.py#l4708 |
|
|
| msg212168 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 08:20 |
| This issue has already been assigned CVE-2014-1912 Reference: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/02/12/16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2014-1912 |
|
|
| msg212179 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 14:17 |
| We don't currently have the capability to set an email trigger when the type is set to security. That should be submitted as a request on the meta tracker. (It will require a new reactor, which is easy, and a tweak to the database schema, which I don't offhand remember how to deploy, but it shouldn't be hard.) |
|
|
| msg212196 - (view) |
Author: Chris Rose (offby1) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 18:48 |
| Is there an ETA for a 2.7.7 release with this fix? |
|
|
| msg212206 - (view) |
Author: Ryan Smith-Roberts (rmsr) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 19:52 |
| I notified security@python.org and waited for the go-ahead (from Guido I think) before opening this bug. If today is the first that the PSRT is hearing about this, then the issue is broader than just the bugtracker. |
|
|
| msg212207 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 19:55 |
| Yes, your message reached PSRT on Jan 12th. |
|
|
| msg212208 - (view) |
Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2014-02-25 19:56 |
| Sorry, you are right and I was wrong. :( Your mail *was* delivered to PSRT. But it failed to reach me because I was having issues with my @python.org account. The server-side spam filter is now deactivated and I receive all mails again. |
|
|
| msg212248 - (view) |
Author: Peter Funk (pefu) |
Date: 2014-02-26 11:25 |
| A recently posted proof of concept exploit got a lot of attention: https://www.trustedsec.com/february-2014/python-remote-code-execution-socket-recvfrom_into/ I suggest some Python core developer should clarify here whether people running some publically available python based web service (Zope, Plone, Roundup, MoinMoin, or whatever) are vulnerable or not. |
|
|
| msg212249 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * |
Date: 2014-02-26 11:28 |
| recvfrom_into() is hardly ever used, including in the stdlib itself. People using third-party software should check that the software itself doesn't call this method (chances are it doesn't). |
|
|
| msg212253 - (view) |
Author: Peter Funk (pefu) |
Date: 2014-02-26 13:07 |
| Antoine Pitrou: > recvfrom_into() is hardly ever used, including in the stdlib itself. Thank you for the quick clarification. This will certainly help to calm down nervous people. Best regards, Peter. |
|
|
| msg212418 - (view) |
Author: Kubilay Kocak (koobs) |
Date: 2014-02-28 10:27 |
| Can somebody backport the fixes for the test breakages to 3.1 and 3.2 please, it seems they were forgotten. The original CVE fix includes changes to test_socket.py so I cant imagine security-only-fix policy applies. Thanks! |
|
|
| msg212489 - (view) |
Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) |
Date: 2014-03-01 07:04 |
| New changeset c25e1442529f by Stefan Krah in branch '3.1': Issue #20246: Fix test failures on FreeBSD. Patch by Ryan Smith-Roberts. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c25e1442529f New changeset e82dcd700e8c by Stefan Krah in branch '3.2': Issue #20246: Fix test failures on FreeBSD. Patch by Ryan Smith-Roberts. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e82dcd700e8c |
|
|
| msg212490 - (view) |
Author: Kubilay Kocak (koobs) |
Date: 2014-03-01 07:16 |
| Thank you Stefan |
|
|