Issue 23917: please fall back to sequential compilation when concurrent doesn't exist (original) (raw)

Created on 2015-04-11 22:52 by doko, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
issue23917.patch Claudiu.Popa,2015-04-19 20:10 review
Messages (6)
msg240507 - (view) Author: Matthias Klose (doko) * (Python committer) Date: 2015-04-11 22:52
issue #16104 introduces parallel byte compilation, however the method is now overly strict when workers > 1 and no concurrent support available. Please just fall back to sequential byte compilation in this case.
msg240881 - (view) Author: PCManticore (Claudiu.Popa) * (Python triager) Date: 2015-04-14 13:26
Will do, thanks.
msg241561 - (view) Author: PCManticore (Claudiu.Popa) * (Python triager) Date: 2015-04-19 20:10
Here's the patch.
msg241655 - (view) Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * (Python committer) Date: 2015-04-20 14:50
LGTM
msg241775 - (view) Author: Roundup Robot (python-dev) (Python triager) Date: 2015-04-22 06:38
New changeset 572dc6bdc0a3 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default': Issue #23917: Fall back to sequential compilation when ProcessPoolExecutor doesn't exist. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/572dc6bdc0a3
msg241776 - (view) Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * (Python committer) Date: 2015-04-22 06:39
Thanks Claudiu.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:58:15 admin set github: 68105
2015-04-22 06:39:58 berker.peksag set status: open -> closednosy: + berker.peksagmessages: + resolution: fixedstage: commit review -> resolved
2015-04-22 06:38:52 python-dev set nosy: + python-devmessages: +
2015-04-20 14:50:27 brett.cannon set messages: + stage: patch review -> commit review
2015-04-19 20:10:55 Claudiu.Popa set files: + issue23917.patchkeywords: + patchmessages: + stage: needs patch -> patch review
2015-04-14 13:26:09 Claudiu.Popa set assignee: Claudiu.Popatype: behaviormessages: + stage: needs patch
2015-04-11 22:52:09 doko create