| msg255985 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2015-12-05 22:11 |
| It states "bitmap: 1=optimized | 2=newlocals |
4=*arg |
8=**arg" which is identical to the 2.7 docs. Hence it bears no resemblance to the latest code.h, which for example has #define CO_ITERABLE_COROUTINE 0x0100. |
| msg256007 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2015-12-06 08:57 |
| None of these constants are documented either:- inspect.CO_COROUTINE inspect.CO_GENERATOR inspect.CO_ITERABLE_COROUTINE inspect.CO_NESTED inspect.CO_NEWLOCALS inspect.CO_NOFREE inspect.CO_OPTIMIZED inspect.CO_VARARGS inspect.CO_VARKEYWORDS |
|
|
| msg257240 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2015-12-30 20:52 |
| Anybody? |
|
|
| msg257365 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2016-01-02 21:27 |
| Clearly nobody is interested so closing. |
|
|
| msg257366 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2016-01-02 21:34 |
| I am the OP, this stays closed. If you couldn't be bothered to reply before please raise a new issue. |
|
|
| msg257367 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) *  |
Date: 2016-01-02 21:35 |
| I think Yuri might be interested. |
|
|
| msg257368 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2016-01-02 21:38 |
| Mark, please don't close the issue. You raised a valid point, it got overlooked, but like I said I think Yuri will be interested in looking at it. This is a volunteer operation. |
|
|
| msg257369 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2016-01-02 21:38 |
| For the final time, *I* am the OP and not one of you could be bothered before so this remains closed. |
|
|
| msg257370 - (view) |
Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2016-01-02 21:44 |
| I'll leave it closed, but I don't think that is best for the community. |
|
|
| msg257498 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2016-01-04 21:56 |
| > For the final time, *I* am the OP and not one of you could be bothered before so this remains closed. Are you quite all right? Continuing behavior of that sort will get your tracker account disabled. |
|
|
| msg257499 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2016-01-04 22:09 |
| It's all ready been superceeded, or haven't you woken up to that fact either? |
|
|
| msg257501 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2016-01-04 22:26 |
| > It's all ready been superceeded, or haven't you woken up to that fact either? Excuse me for not having all issues in my head. (And that #26010 states that it's a followup to #26010 doesn't help.) In the future, please accept that the core developers are who decide about issues being closed or not. Submitters are only given privilege to close their own issues because it lightens the load on coredevs if issues become obsolete (and no, no answer in less than 30 days does not mean obsolete). As I already said, abusing that privilege will eventually get you banned - so much the sooner with your past history taken into account. |
|
|