Issue 26982: Clarify forward annotations in PEP 484 (original) (raw)

Issue26982

Created on 2016-05-09 01:11 by James.Tatum, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
forward_references.patch James.Tatum,2016-05-09 01:26
Messages (3)
msg265177 - (view) Author: James Tatum (James.Tatum) * Date: 2016-05-09 01:11
In https://github.com/python/typeshed/issues/180, we discussed a slight ambiguity with PEP 484's mention of forward references. It wasn't entirely clear that they don't apply unless using function annotations. This patch attempts to clear up the ambiguity.
msg275248 - (view) Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * (Python committer) Date: 2016-09-09 04:04
The PEPs repo is not on github. Please resubmit this patch as a PR at https://github.com/python/peps. (Sorry for all the indirections to different trackers.)
msg275249 - (view) Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) * (Python committer) Date: 2016-09-09 04:06
(And by "not" I meant "now". Sorry.)
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:58:30 admin set github: 71169
2016-09-09 04:06:16 gvanrossum set messages: +
2016-09-09 04:04:38 gvanrossum set status: open -> closedresolution: rejectedmessages: +
2016-09-08 23:19:19 levkivskyi set nosy: + levkivskyi
2016-05-09 04:08:37 gvanrossum set assignee: docs@python -> gvanrossumnosy: + gvanrossum
2016-05-09 01:26:23 James.Tatum set files: + forward_references.patch
2016-05-09 01:26:15 James.Tatum set files: - forward_references.patch
2016-05-09 01:15:53 James.Tatum set files: + forward_references.patch
2016-05-09 01:15:37 James.Tatum set files: - forward_references.patch
2016-05-09 01:11:51 James.Tatum create