Issue 28458: from future import print_function does not emulate the flush param from py3k (original) (raw)
Issue28458
Created on 2016-10-17 07:56 by Attila-Mihaly Balazs, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (2) | ||
|---|---|---|
| msg278797 - (view) | Author: Attila-Mihaly Balazs (Attila-Mihaly Balazs) | Date: 2016-10-17 07:56 |
| Doing the following in Python 2.7.12 does not work: from __future__ import print_function print(1, flush=True) It says: "'flush' is an invalid keyword argument for this function" While the following is a perfectly valid python 3k statement: print(1, flush=True) | ||
| msg278798 - (view) | Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) *  |
Date: 2016-10-17 08:07 |
| That's because the flush argument was added in Python 3.3 (after print() was backported to 2.7 via a future import) Thanks for the report. |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:38 | admin | set | github: 72644 |
| 2016-10-17 08:07:26 | berker.peksag | set | status: open -> closednosy: + berker.peksagmessages: + resolution: not a bugstage: resolved |
| 2016-10-17 07:56:45 | Attila-Mihaly Balazs | create |