Issue 4011: Create DAG for PEP 101 (original) (raw)
This issue has been migrated to GitHub: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/48261
classification
Title: | Create DAG for PEP 101 | |
---|---|---|
Type: | Stage: | needs patch |
Components: | Versions: |
process
Status: | closed | Resolution: | wont fix |
---|---|---|---|
Dependencies: | Superseder: | ||
Assigned To: | Nosy List: | brett.cannon, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, larry | |
Priority: | low | Keywords: |
Created on 2008-10-01 21:31 by brett.cannon, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (7) | ||
---|---|---|
msg74147 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * ![]() |
Date: 2008-10-01 21:31 |
PEP 101 says it would be nice to have a dependency graph that showed what could and could not be done in parallel when cutting a release. Should throw one together using OmniGraffle or Graphviz. | ||
msg112547 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * ![]() |
Date: 2010-08-02 20:56 |
I'll probably get around to do this during the 3.2 period. | ||
msg164531 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * ![]() |
Date: 2012-07-02 19:25 |
Is this still worth doing, Georg? Or should we make Larry do it? =) | ||
msg164577 - (view) | Author: Larry Hastings (larry) * ![]() |
Date: 2012-07-03 05:39 |
Note: I don't have Macs, so I can't run OmniGiraffe. And a quick gander at the Graphviz website suggests its output lacks the sublime elegance Python documentation has become known for. | ||
msg164758 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * ![]() |
Date: 2012-07-06 22:27 |
I think you can make nice graphs with graphviz if you put effort into it :) | ||
msg181127 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * ![]() |
Date: 2013-02-01 22:34 |
Would this still be useful to do? Thanks to my latest import talk I have experience with graphviz but I don't want to waste my time if people don't need it. | ||
msg181250 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * ![]() |
Date: 2013-02-03 09:01 |
While it's nice to look at a graphical representation, clearly there is no deep interest (and PEP 101 has so many little steps that you couldn't possibly fit them all into a graph, so you have to consult the text anyway). I see no reason to keep this open. |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:56:39 | admin | set | github: 48261 |
2013-02-03 09:01:06 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> closedresolution: wont fixmessages: + |
2013-02-03 04:39:52 | ezio.melotti | set | nosy: + ezio.melotti |
2013-02-01 22:34:43 | brett.cannon | set | assignee: larry -> messages: + |
2012-07-06 22:27:52 | georg.brandl | set | assignee: georg.brandl -> larrymessages: + |
2012-07-03 05:39:00 | larry | set | messages: + |
2012-07-03 04🔞55 | eric.araujo | set | nosy: + eric.araujo |
2012-07-02 19:25:13 | brett.cannon | set | nosy: + larrymessages: + |
2010-08-02 20:56:47 | georg.brandl | set | assignee: georg.brandlmessages: + nosy: + georg.brandl |
2009-03-28 20:05:37 | brett.cannon | set | assignee: brett.cannon -> (no value) |
2009-02-11 03:15:14 | brett.cannon | set | stage: needs patch |
2008-10-01 21:31:05 | brett.cannon | create |