Issue 4511: Decorators should have an index entry (original) (raw)
Issue4511
Created on 2008-12-04 00:28 by dvusboy, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (4) | ||
---|---|---|
msg76857 - (view) | Author: K. C. Wong (dvusboy) | Date: 2008-12-04 00:28 |
While decorators have been introduced since Python 2.4, there continues to be no index reference to it in the Python Language Reference. Given this being a major language feature, I think it is an oversight. | ||
msg77031 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * ![]() |
Date: 2008-12-05 15:30 |
In the 2.6 and 3.0 docs, decorators do have an index entry, see http://docs.python.org/genindex-D.html. | ||
msg77039 - (view) | Author: K. C. Wong (dvusboy) | Date: 2008-12-05 17:04 |
My mistake for including 2.6. While having a link to an entry in the Glossary is a huge improvement, it comes about as a result of the index now covering all components of the Python documentation. I feel at the least, there should be a link within the glossary entry back to the appropriate sections in the Language Reference. | ||
msg77048 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * ![]() |
Date: 2008-12-05 18:00 |
OK, I've added a back-link in r67591. |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-11 14:56:42 | admin | set | github: 48761 |
2008-12-05 18:00:22 | georg.brandl | set | messages: + |
2008-12-05 17:04:19 | dvusboy | set | messages: + |
2008-12-05 15:30:58 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> closedresolution: fixedmessages: + |
2008-12-04 00:28:33 | dvusboy | create |