Issue 4614: Document PyModule_Create() - Python tracker (original) (raw)

Created on 2008-12-09 21:06 by brett.cannon, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
new-module-apis.diff georg.brandl,2009-01-02 20:20
Messages (9)
msg77454 - (view) Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * (Python committer) Date: 2008-12-09 21:06
PyModule_Create() is not documented (or at least it isn't showing up in the C API index). Might be other parts of the new module initialization API that are not documented either.
msg78840 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-02 16:54
What's the policy for marking bug reports as critical? If the description of the priority (Might block a future release) is normative, why got this report marked critical? I don't think a documentation bug can ever block a release.
msg78841 - (view) Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-02 17:00
I'm not suggesting that this should block a release (if that is the definition of critical). I do however think this is critical for 3.x's adoption and therefore should be of much importance to us.
msg78845 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-02 17:24
I'm a bit worried about committers giving other committers priorities on how they should work; as a principle, volunteers are free to work on whatever they please, in whatever order they please. So unassigning Georg.
msg78847 - (view) Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-02 17:31
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > > I'm a bit worried about committers giving other committers priorities on > how they should work; as a principle, volunteers are free to work on > whatever they please, in whatever order they please. Of course. > > So unassigning Georg. It would be really nice if there were some notes on use of the tracker.
msg78851 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-02 17:58
> It would be really nice if there were some notes on use of the tracker. I think Brett has a vision here; you might ping him what the status of that is.
msg78868 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-02 20:20
Attaching a doc patch -- Martin, could you please confirm that I didn't write nonsense?
msg79094 - (view) Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-04 23:14
The patch looks about right. I believe it is a bug that md_state isn't automatically freed; m_free should be used to release any resources stored inside md_state (or any other resources that the module might hold). So please remove the note on releasing md_state.
msg79096 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) Date: 2009-01-04 23:20
OK, fixed up and committed as r68327.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:56:42 admin set github: 48864
2009-01-04 23:20:37 georg.brandl set status: open -> closedresolution: fixedmessages: +
2009-01-04 23:14:40 loewis set assignee: loewis -> georg.brandlmessages: +
2009-01-02 20:20:15 georg.brandl set files: + new-module-apis.diffassignee: loewismessages: + keywords: + patch
2009-01-02 17:58:03 loewis set messages: +
2009-01-02 17:31:13 benjamin.peterson set messages: +
2009-01-02 17:24:31 loewis set assignee: georg.brandl -> (no value)messages: +
2009-01-02 17:00:22 benjamin.peterson set priority: critical -> highnosy: + benjamin.petersonmessages: +
2009-01-02 16:54:35 loewis set messages: +
2009-01-02 00:43:34 benjamin.peterson set priority: critical
2008-12-10 03:01:27 benjamin.peterson set keywords: + needs reviewnosy: + loewis
2008-12-09 21:06:46 brett.cannon create