| msg88658 - (view) |
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid) |
Date: 2009-06-01 17:22 |
| This is being successfully used in ActivePython. |
|
|
| msg89427 - (view) |
Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) *  |
Date: 2009-06-16 07:54 |
| This patch will not work with the compiler is gcc or g++ Is that intended ? |
|
|
| msg89438 - (view) |
Author: Trent Mick (trentm) * |
Date: 2009-06-16 19:44 |
| Tarek, This should not affect anyone using gcc or g++ on AIX because of this check just before the lines added by this patch: elif compiler[:3] == "gcc" or compiler[:3] == "g++": return "-Wl,-R" + dir The intention of the patch is to fix linker argument handling with NOT using gcc, i.e. when using IBM's native AIX compiler. |
|
|
| msg89445 - (view) |
Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) * |
Date: 2009-06-17 06:59 |
| Yes, I know it will not affect g++ or gcc users, I was asking that to make sure Sridhar do not intend to make it work on a system where gcc or g++ are *also* used since they will be picked prior to this option. I'll include that patch then. |
|
|
| msg89534 - (view) |
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid) |
Date: 2009-06-19 23:42 |
| Hey Tarek, Trent was the one who wrote the patch originally and hence I had asked him to comment. |
|
|
| msg89538 - (view) |
Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) * |
Date: 2009-06-20 13:58 |
| done in r73490. Will wait for 3.1 final release to apply it to the py3k branch. |
|
|
| msg89794 - (view) |
Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) * |
Date: 2009-06-28 21:33 |
| merged in 3.2 in r73647 |
|
|
| msg101149 - (view) |
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid) |
Date: 2010-03-16 02:45 |
| BTW, 3.1.2rc1 does not contain this fix, but contains . Any reason why this fix is missing in 3.1.2rc1? |
|
|
| msg101200 - (view) |
Author: Roumen Petrov (rpetrov) * |
Date: 2010-03-16 23:19 |
| and restore of distutils in trunk abandon it. |
|
|
| msg101202 - (view) |
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid) |
Date: 2010-03-16 23:31 |
| Ah, I see. I am just re-opening this bug hoping to see it get fixed by 3.1.2. |
|
|
| msg101205 - (view) |
Author: Tarek Ziadé (tarek) * |
Date: 2010-03-17 00:05 |
| Yes, the revert put back distutils in its initial 2.6.x state but I guess this can be added back since it doesn't change the original behavior. |
|
|
| msg116419 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2010-09-14 21:20 |
| Oops, this didn’t make it into 3.1.2. Tarek, want me to commit it? |
|
|
| msg145212 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 04:47 |
| This was fixed in 2.7 and 3.2; no luck for 3.1. |
|
|
| msg145240 - (view) |
Author: Roumen Petrov (rpetrov) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 09:03 |
| hmm, and commit that close issue is ? |
|
|
| msg145241 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 09:05 |
| See above: “done in r73490” and “merged in 3.2 in r73647”. |
|
|
| msg145242 - (view) |
Author: Roumen Petrov (rpetrov) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 09:10 |
| see above "and restore of distutils in trunk abandon it." |
|
|
| msg145243 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 09:12 |
| This was supposed to be added to 3.1 but we missed it. |
|
|
| msg145245 - (view) |
Author: Roumen Petrov (rpetrov) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 09:17 |
| For protocol blibpath is not in any release - get download and check content . Did you apply a different fix ? |
|
|
| msg145248 - (view) |
Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-10-09 09:25 |
| Ah, I thought it was missing only in 3.1. I will reapply the patch. |
|
|
| msg247809 - (view) |
Author: Mark Lawrence (BreamoreBoy) * |
Date: 2015-08-01 13:14 |
| The original was never reapplied and wouldn't now apply so I've attached an updated version. |
|
|