Issue 8851: pkgutil documentation needs more markup (original) (raw)

Issue8851

Created on 2010-05-29 04:38 by mft, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
pkgutil.diff mft,2010-05-29 04:38 a possible patch
Messages (3)
msg106708 - (view) Author: MATSUI Tetsushi (mft) Date: 2010-05-29 04:38
The library reference of pkgutil is only sparsely marked up. The attached patch is against 2.6 version, because I'm currently working with 2.6. Since a part of markups (namely :pep:'s) has already been done for 3.2 version, the patch cannot be applied directly to that version, and I haven't checked the versions in between.
msg114510 - (view) Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * (Python committer) Date: 2010-08-21 16:48
Thanks for the report. Patch looks good to me. I assume the other function descriptions already have complete markup, since your patch touches only two of them. If there are no remarks from docs@python or objections from Georg, I will apply this in a week, taking care of all three branches.
msg124082 - (view) Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * (Python committer) Date: 2010-12-15 22:39
Missing markup for one ``None`` added in r87289 and following revisions for maintenance branches.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:57:01 admin set github: 53097
2010-12-15 22:39:46 eric.araujo set status: pending -> closednosy:mft, eric.araujo, docs@pythonmessages: + resolution: accepted -> fixedstage: patch review -> resolved
2010-08-21 16:49:11 eric.araujo set status: open -> pendingtitle: pkgutil document needs more markups -> pkgutil documentation needs more markupresolution: acceptedstage: patch review
2010-08-21 16:48:41 eric.araujo set versions: + Python 3.1, Python 2.7, Python 3.2, - Python 2.6nosy: + eric.araujomessages: + assignee: docs@python -> eric.araujo
2010-05-29 04:38:18 mft create