Issue 9671: test_executable_without_cwd fails: AssertionError: 1 != 47 (original) (raw)
Created on 2010-08-24 16:40 by srid, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (8)
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid)
Date: 2010-08-24 16:40
I see the following failure on Fedora Core 4 (32-bit and 64-bit) with Python 2.7.0.
====================================================================== FAIL: test_executable_without_cwd (test.test_subprocess.ProcessTestCase)
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/apy/rrun/tmp/autotest/apy/lib/python2.7/test/test_subprocess.py", line 157, in test_executable_without_cwd self.assertEqual(p.returncode, 47) AssertionError: 1 != 47
====================================================================== FAIL: test_executable_without_cwd (test.test_subprocess.ProcessTestCaseNoPoll)
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/apy/rrun/tmp/autotest/apy/lib/python2.7/test/test_subprocess.py", line 157, in test_executable_without_cwd self.assertEqual(p.returncode, 47) AssertionError: 1 != 47
Author: Sandro Tosi (sandro.tosi) * 
Date: 2010-12-31 19:24
Hello, I tried on a freshly build 2.7, and I can't replicate the reported error. Could it be it has been fixed by r78136?
Sridhar, are you still seeing this error?
Cheers, Sandro
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid)
Date: 2011-01-03 20:04
Sandro Tosi wrote:
Sridhar, are you still seeing this error?
I still see the error with Python 2.7.1.
Author: Dave Malcolm (dmalcolm)
Date: 2011-01-04 00:39
Note that for that test case to be run, it must be on an installed python: @unittest.skipIf(sysconfig.is_python_build(), "need an installed Python. See #7774")
Am testing the 2.7 branch now on an x86_64 Fedora 13 box
Author: Dave Malcolm (dmalcolm)
Date: 2011-01-04 00:48
That test works for me on this x86_64 Fedora 13 box (using latest 2.7 code from SVN, built and installed to a test prefix):
[david@surprise bin]$ ./python -m test.regrtest -v test_subprocess == CPython 2.7.1+ (release27-maint:87724, Jan 3 2011, 19:39:26) [GCC 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10)] == Linux-2.6.33.3-84.fc13.x86_64-x86_64-with-fedora-13-Goddard little-endian == /tmp/test_python_24104 Testing with flags: sys.flags(debug=0, py3k_warning=0, division_warning=0, division_new=0, inspect=0, interactive=0, optimize=0, dont_write_bytecode=0, no_user_site=0, no_site=0, ignore_environment=0, tabcheck=0, verbose=0, unicode=0, bytes_warning=0) test_subprocess ... test_executable_without_cwd (test.test_subprocess.ProcessTestCase) ... ok ... test_executable_without_cwd (test.test_subprocess.ProcessTestCaseNoPoll) ... ok ...
though I do see another failure:
FAIL: test_wait_when_sigchild_ignored (test.test_subprocess.POSIXProcessTestCase)
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/david/coding/python-svn-anon/2.7-clean/tmp-prefix/lib/python2.7/test/test_subprocess.py", line 841, in test_wait_when_sigchild_ignored " non-zero with this error:\n%s" % stderr) AssertionError: sigchild_ignore.py exited non-zero with this error: /home/david/coding/python-svn-anon/2.7-clean/tmp-prefix/bin/python: can't open file 'subprocessdata/sigchild_ignore.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Ran 123 tests in 17.621s
FAILED (failures=1, skipped=14)
Author: Dave Malcolm (dmalcolm)
Date: 2011-01-04 00:51
I should note that Fedora Core 4 reached its "End of Life" at August 2006: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life
Do you see this with a more up-to-date version of Fedora?
Author: Sridhar Ratnakumar (srid)
Date: 2011-01-04 01:04
Dave Malcolm wrote:
I should note that Fedora Core 4 reached its "End of Life" at August 2006: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life
Do you see this with a more up-to-date version of Fedora?
I don't have access to other versions of FC at the moment.
Hmm, if this bug is specific to a EoL'ed version FC, then perhaps this issue can be closed as WontFix?
Author: Sandro Tosi (sandro.tosi) *
Date: 2011-01-04 13:37
Ok, so the situation is:
- I've test on debian sid and it works fine
- Dave on a Fedora 13 and it works
- I asked a couple of guys to try it on their systems, that's Fedora14 and Gentoo and it works fine
So I think we can conclude it's a Fedora Core 4 specific problem (that's EOL tho).
I'm closing this report (if someone thinks it's too early, please reopen it :)
Cheers, Sandro
History
Date
User
Action
Args
2022-04-11 14:57:05
admin
set
github: 53880
2011-01-04 13:37:29
sandro.tosi
set
status: open -> closed
messages: +
resolution: not a bug
nosy:srid, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi
2011-01-04 01:04:49
srid
set
nosy:srid, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi
messages: +
2011-01-04 00:51:56
dmalcolm
set
nosy:srid, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi
messages: +
2011-01-04 00:48:49
dmalcolm
set
nosy:srid, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi
messages: +
2011-01-04 00:39:24
dmalcolm
set
nosy:srid, dmalcolm, sandro.tosi
messages: +
2011-01-04 00:31:27
pitrou
set
nosy: + dmalcolm
2011-01-03 20:04:34
srid
set
nosy:srid, sandro.tosi
messages: +
2010-12-31 19:24:31
sandro.tosi
set
nosy: + sandro.tosi
messages: +
2010-08-24 16:40:31
srid
create