RASC Calgary Centre - The Constellations (original) (raw)

Romanian translation of this web page at: http://webhostinggeeks.com/science/constellation-calgary-rmby Web Geek Science

By: Larry McNish
Page last updated November 5, 2018
(Page originally created October 21, 2005)

Interested in Astronomy? Become a member of the RASC!

Click here to find out about RASC membership and RASC publications.

| Contents A Short History of the Constellations The Constellations of the Zodiac Regarding Sizes and Positions of the Constellations Square Degrees - the Area of something on the sky Right Ascension and Declination - the Position of something on the sky List of the Constellations The Piano and the Constellations - Coincidence? | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ------------------------------------------------- |

A Short History of the Constellations

Have you ever looked at the night sky and wondered about all those stars and the patterns that some of the stars seem to make? Well, so did all the ancient cultures of the world. In trying to explain those patterns to succeeding generations (before books were commonly available), they thought of them as "connect the dots" pictures in the night sky, and made up myths to explain how they got there. Thus started the 'mythology' of the star patterns which have been handed down from generation to generation since the time of the Babylonians and ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. This mythology was not only concerned about the major star groupings that the Sun, Moon and planets seemed to wander through (the "Zodiac") but all the other patterns that could be seen from Babylon, Greece and Rome. The constellations of the "Zodiac" date from about 600 B.C.

Today, we know that these chance alignment of bright stars that seem to make patterns is just a coincidence of our place in the Milky Way Galaxy. If we could travel about The Galaxy at will, we could view these patterns from different places and different angles and see that many of the stars are not closely related at all, but stretch far out into inter-stellar space. However, from our point of view on Earth, these star patterns or "asterisms" are fairly easy to recognize.

Surrounding these bright star "asterisms" are many dimmer stars that do not form part of the pattern. Since the time of the Greek astronomer Claudius Ptolemy(c 100 to 170 AD) and his 13 volume "Almagest" which defined an original set of 48 constellations, people have been observing and charting the bright as well as the not-so-bright stars on the sky and cataloging them in books. In order to record them they were given names, then Greek letters for the next dimmer generation, and then numbers when the invention of the telescope showed many, many more stars than could be seen with the naked eye or named or lettered.

When you take all the stars in a region of the sky and group them together under one naming or numbering scheme you have a "constellation". The constellations were originally charted by astronomers of the northern hemisphere. Then with the advent of better navigation and sailing ships exploring the southern hemisphere, all the southern constellations were documented as well.

However, there was no "right" way to do this and so many ancient star charts and globes (yes - they knew the world was round) show constellations invented and drawn by the astronomers doing the work (sometimes independently, sometimes in spite of earlier works).

It wasn't until 1930 that the International Astronomical Union (IAU) resolved all these different charts into one common, standard way of grouping the multitude of known stars and published what we now call the set of "modern constellations". In 1922 they had agreed on 88 different constellations and names, each very specifically defined as a region of the sky. Due to historical significance they could not just divide the sky up into equal regions and start anew - they had to include major asterisms in certain constellations and respect the heritage of most of the night sky's star patterns. (The boundaries themselves were drawn by Eug�ne Delporte, based on coordinates for the year 1875 (!), chosen because this system had already been used by Benjamin Gould in defining boundaries for the southern constellations.) The result is a hodge-podge of different sizes and shapes, some old constellations were dropped, some new ones formed, some stars that were in one "old" constellation suddenly found themselves in a "new" one. Thanks to other historical changes one constellation - Argo Navis - was "shipwrecked" because it was too big, and now all that remains are Carina (the Keel), Vela (the Sails), Puppis (the Stern), Pyxis (the Compass), Volans (the Flying Fish), and Columba (the Dove). One other constellation (Serpens) even consists of two completely separate pieces of the sky (Serpens Caput - the head of the serpent and Serpens Cauda - the tail of the serpent) separated by Ophiuchus - The Serpent Holder. Does this mean that instead of 88 constellations there are actually "87 and two halves" ?

Nowadays, it can be difficult to make out some of the creatures the ancients saw in the patterns of the stars since many of the dimmer stars that form part of the outlines are nearly invisible from our light-polluted cities. Not only that, but a number of southern constellations were named "in honour" of something and bear no resemblance to the item it is named for at all.

It is important to note that you cannot go out and view all the constellations in one evening. For one thing, the night side of the Earth can see only about 1/2 the sky at any time. For another, for Northern hemisphere observers, the further south you look the more the planet Earth itself gets in the way preventing you from seeing the more southerly stars. Therefore in an evening's observing, you only get to see about 1/2 of 1/2 or 1/4 of the constellations in the sky. If you go out observing from month to month, the orbit of the Earth around the sun will make some constellations disappear in the West and others rise in the East over the course of weeks. Therefore, in a year's time, you can see all the constellations visible from your location.

To see the other half of the constellations, you have to travel to the other (N or S) hemisphere and spend some more weeks or months viewing those that cannot be seen from home. People living at high altitudes near the equator have the best view of both the N and S hemispheres without traveling - this is why many of the world's largest telescopes are located in Hawaii, the Canary Islands, Chile etc.

^ top

The Constellations of the Zodiac

As mentioned above, the ancients observed that the Sun, Moon and those 5 funny wandering stars (the planets known to the ancients) seem to be constrained to a particular region of the sky, never traveling really far north or south of a wide band of stars. They divided this sky band into 12 sections based on the old constellations, each differing in width but all of them about 16° high (+8°/-8°) and called them the "Zodiac". Each division is named for the constellation situated within its limits in the 2nd century B.C.!

The name "Zodiac" is derived from the Greek, meaning "animal circle" (also related to the word "zoo"), and it comes from the fact that most of these constellations are named for animals, such as Leo, the Lion, Taurus, the Bull and Cancer, the Crab. It turns out that this band of the sky is centered on a line called the **"ecliptic"**which is the apparent path the Sun appears to take through the sky as a result of the Earth's revolution around it (actually, it is defined as the projection the Earth's orbital plane into outer space). If we could see the stars in the daytime, we would see the Sun slowly wander from one constellation of the Zodiac to the next, making one complete circle around the sky in one year. Which constellation the Sun was in had to be inferred by drawing all the constellations, then noting which was the last to set before sunrise and which was the first to rise after sunset then assuming the Sun was half way in between.

The order of the constellations of the Zodiac (as given by the apparent motion of the Sun over a year is:

Constellation The Sun in 2011 at Noon from Calgary
Sagittarius The Archer December 18 to January 19 (33 days)
Capricornus The Goat January 20 to February 15 (27 days)
Aquarius The Water-bearer February 16 to March 12 (25 days)
Pisces The Fishes March 13 to April 18 (37 days)
Aries The Ram April 19 to May 13 (25 days)
Taurus The Bull May 14 to June 21 (39 days)
Gemini The Twins June 22 to July 20 (29 days)
Cancer The Crab July 21 to August 10 (21 days)
Leo The Lion August 11 to September 16 (37 days)
Virgo The Maiden September 17 to October 30 (44 days)
Libra The Balance October 31 to November 23 (24 days)
Scorpius The Scorpion November 24 to November 29 ( 6 days)
Ophiuchus** The Serpent-holder November 30 to December 17 (18 days)

(The dates vary from year to year.)

Interestingly, the "sign of the Zodiac" which has been assigned for a given month in "horoscopes" that you'll find in your daily newspaper is not where the Sun actually is that particular month. It is based on the definitions of the constellations and where the Sun would have been thousands of years ago! This changes due to the "wobble" of the Earth's axis (known as precession - like the wobble of a spinning top) which alters the direction in the sky to which the North Pole points. Owing to the "Precession of the Equinoxes" about the Ecliptic, the "First Point of Aries" (a special point on this path) changes 1° about every 70 years and currently lies in the constellation Pisces, not Aries. In about 24,000 years when the 360° precession circuit has completed, the Zodiacal signs and constellations will again coincide. Also, over thousands of years, the relative positions of all the stars change due to their own motion through the galaxy.

** Yes, the ecliptic (and the Sun) also passes through the constellation of Ophiuchus (from about November 29/30 to December 17), which is not included among the so-called signs of the Zodiac. In fact, the Sun now spends more time traversing through Ophiuchus than nearby Scorpius but you never hear anyone say "my sign is Ophiuchus (O-fE-U-kus) the Serpent Holder".

On the left is a diagram of the Sun's path across the sky from Nov 20 to Dec 20 2008.The Sun's apparent motion is right to left along the yellow and red line ending at the bright spot indicating the Sun on Dec 20.It starts in Libra (right side) passes through a small "Texas Panhandle" portion of Scorpius, crosses all the way across the bottom of Ophiuchus and ends in Sagittarius.It's easy to see that saying the Sun is in Ophiuchus is not a minuscule error.(Click on the image to the left for a larger picture.) Original image from Starry Night Pro. Notations by the author.

In addition, because the Moon and planets are often positioned either just to the north or south of the ecliptic, it allows them to sometimes appear within the boundaries of several other non-zodiacal star patterns. For instance, Saturn can officially be within the boundaries of Orion (passing across the Hunter's club). Other constellations that can be visited by the Moon and planets include Auriga (the Charioteer), Cetus (the Whale), and Sextans (the Sextant). Not to belabour the point, but given that the zodiac extends 8° north and 8° south of the ecliptic, an additional twelve modern constellations reside in part within the zodiac's belt of stars: Auriga, Canis Minor, Cetus, Corvus, Crater, Hydra, Ophiuchus, Orion, Pegasus, Scutum, Serpens and Sextans, althoughanother reference states that the planets do not actually pass through Auriga, Canis Minor, and Serpens when their actual orbits are computed.

^ top

Regarding Sizes and Positions of the Constellations

How "big" is something that is so far away?

Common measurements like kilometers or miles make no sense when we look at the distant patterns of stars on the night sky - the celestial sphere. We need a measurement system that works when we can't go "out there" and measure it directly. The system that works the best is based on angles - how big an angle something makes relative to our eye. Angles also work horizontally, vertically or diagonally. So we use **angular measurement**to describe distances and areas on the sky.

For example, here we see several angular
measurements of the constellation Ursa Major
and the (widely) separated stars Mizar and Alcor:

^ top

Square Degrees - the Area of something on the sky

| The surface area of a circle is given by the equation:Area = π R 2where "R" is the radius of the circle. | | The surface area of a sphere is given by the equation:Area = 4 π R 2where "R" is the radius of the sphere. | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | But we want the Area of the sphere in "square degrees", like our angular distance measurement.The solution is not as simple as multiplying 360° by 360° - the actual answer is a lot less (though still a large number): Area of a sphere in square degrees = 4 π (57.29578) 2 = 41,252.96(where π = 3.1415927 and 57.29578 is the number of degrees in a "radian" angle)(and, yes - the number of square degrees on a sphere is not a whole number!)So, the sizes of the constellations (given in the table below) take some advanced spherical math to figure out. | | |

So, if you took a picture that covered 1° by 1° of the sky, you would require over 41,253 pictures to cover the whole sky (with each one overlapping its neighbours slightly) due to the curvature of the celestial sphere.

Since the size of the Sun and the Moon are about 1/2° (circular) you would need more than 4 times that many rectangular pictures (about 165,000) to cover the whole sky at that resolution. Its no wonder then, that star atlases such as those used by astronomers have so many very large pages of only medium-resolution sky maps.

There are 88 constellations. Therefore, each covers (on average) about 468.8 square degrees on the sky, but they come in all sizes and shapes from the smallest - Crux (The Cross) at 68 square degrees, to the largest - Hydra (The Water Snake) at a whopping 1303 square degrees (19 times bigger than Crux)!

^ top

Right Ascension and Declination - the Position of something on the sky

On Earth, every position on land and sea can be specified by two coordinates - your Latitude (north or south of the equator) and your Longitude (east or west of the "prime meridian of longitude" which passes through Greenwich, England).

However, we cannot extend latitude and longitude to outer space because the Earth is spinning and the stars are not.

Since the stars seem "fixed" in space we need to give them their own coordinates (like latitude and longitude) but which are fixed to the stars, not the Earth.

Although a complete description of these new coordinates - Declination and**Right Ascension** - is outside the scope of this discussion on constellations, the diagram below may assist you in understanding this immensely important astronomical concept of map coordinates in space:

Every star, galaxy, nebula and constellation position can be specified by its Right Ascension and Declination.
However, there are three things that must also be taken into account:

List of the Constellations

The List of the Constellations below gives:

Note: Individual constellation areas do not sum to the actual sky area of 41,252.961249419271031294671466156 square degrees due to rounding.