Remove dependency from win32com.client module - Code Review (original) (raw)
Total messages: 15
| techtonik | | 14 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-31 18:19:44 UTC)#1 |
| ------------- | | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
Georg |
Is there a bugs.python.org issue for this? |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-31 19:05:29 UTC)#3 |
techtonik |
There is no b.p.o issue as it's not a bug, but a tiny copy/paste patch ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-31 20:45:44 UTC)#4 |
brian.curtin |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 14:45, techtonik@gmail.com wrote: > There is no b.p.o issue ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-01-31 20:49:43 UTC)#5 |
Martin v. Löwis |
What's the rationale of this change? It certainly doesn't remove the dependency from win32com.client (i.e. ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-01 00:05:07 UTC)#6 |
techtonik |
It removes the dependency from msi.py making it easier to do the rest in subsequent ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-01 07:22:57 UTC)#7 |
Martin v. Löwis |
On 2011/02/01 07:22:57, techtonik wrote: > It removes the dependency from msi.py making it easier ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-01 19:50:23 UTC)#8 |
techtonik |
On 2011/02/01 19:50:23, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > On 2011/02/01 07:22:57, techtonik wrote: > > ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 07:14:17 UTC)#9 |
Martin v. Löwis |
On 2011/02/02 07:14:17, techtonik wrote: > On 2011/02/01 19:50:23, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 07🔞33 UTC)#10 |
techtonik |
On 2011/02/02 07🔞33, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Ah. That shouldn't be done. If anything ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 07:32:02 UTC)#11 |
Georg |
On 2011/02/02 07:32:02, techtonik wrote: [...] Can you PLEASE take this off python-dev and move ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 07:36:47 UTC)#12 |
techtonik |
On 2011/02/02 07:36:47, Georg wrote: > On 2011/02/02 07:32:02, techtonik wrote: > > [...] > ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 08:16:18 UTC)#13 |
Martin v. Löwis |
> It is a surprise to find builtin msilib. Why isn't it used? Originally, because ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 08:36:45 UTC)#14 |
techtonik |
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:36 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" martin@v.loewis.de wrote: > >> ... |
14 years, 3 months ago (2011-02-02 11:03:30 UTC)#15 |