| dbo:abstract |
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (Docket 21–869) is a pending U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with the transformative nature of fair use under U.S. copyright law. The case deals with the Prince Series created by Andy Warhol based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith of the musician Prince, and questions whether Warhol's changes were sufficiently transformative from Goldsmith to fall within fair use, an issue arising from a circuit split between the Second and Ninth Circuits among others. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-869 |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
70418057 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
10855 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1123377048 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Prince_(musician) dbr:Purple_Rain_(album) dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:Vanity_Fair_(magazine) dbc:Andy_Warhol dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Condé_Nast dbr:Gerard_E._Lynch dbr:Google_LLC_v._Oracle_America,_Inc. dbr:Museum_of_Modern_Art dbr:Andy_Warhol dbr:Lynn_Goldsmith dbr:Chilling_effect dbr:Henny_Penny dbr:Tate dbc:Prince_(musician) dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbr:Fair_use dbr:Orange_Prince_(1984) dbr:The_Andy_Warhol_Museum dbr:John_G._Koeltl dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Circuit_split dbr:Second_Circuit dbr:Ninth_Circuit dbr:U.S._Copyright_Office |
| dbp:arguedate |
0001-10-12 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:argueyear |
2022 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:docket |
21 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:fullname |
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. (en) |
| dbp:litigants |
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (en) |
| dbp:oralargument |
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-869 |
| dbp:questionspresented |
Are courts allowed to consider a derivative work's meaning or message when determining if it is a "transformative" fair use, or are courts forbidden from considering any meaning when the derivative work is recognizably derivative from a source material? (en) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_mdy_dates |
| dct:subject |
dbc:Andy_Warhol dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Prince_(musician) dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law |
| rdf:type |
owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (Docket 21–869) is a pending U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with the transformative nature of fair use under U.S. copyright law. The case deals with the Prince Series created by Andy Warhol based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith of the musician Prince, and questions whether Warhol's changes were sufficiently transformative from Goldsmith to fall within fair use, an issue arising from a circuit split between the Second and Ninth Circuits among others. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
wikidata:Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith https://global.dbpedia.org/id/GWrTn |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_...c._v._Goldsmith?oldid=1123377048&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v._Goldsmith |
| foaf:name |
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. (en) |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v_Goldsmith |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law dbr:List_of_pending_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v_Goldsmith |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v._Goldsmith |
