Brumfield v. Cain (original) (raw)
- Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1433_bpm1.pdf
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/13-1433/
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/inadvfdco121108000129
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20140228109
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20151216123
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/13-1433/argument/
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/13-1433/opinion/
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/13-1433
- 47025662 (xsd:integer)
- 6928 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1107906952 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:Samuel_Alito
- dbr:F._Supp._2d
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_on_capital_punishment
- dbr:Baton_Rouge
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_576
- dbr:Death_row
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbr:Clarence_Thomas
- dbr:Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbc:History_of_Baton_Rouge,_Louisiana
- dbc:United_States_death_penalty_case_law
- dbr:Warrick_Dunn
- dbc:2015_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Tampa_Bay_Buccaneers
- dbr:Atkins_v._Virginia
- dbr:Atlanta_Falcons
- dbc:United_States_disability_case_law
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor
- dbc:Capital_punishment_in_Louisiana
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:M.D._La.
- dbr:F.3d
- 0001-03-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2015 (xsd:integer)
- Brumfield v. Cain, (en)
- 0001-06-18 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2015 (xsd:integer)
- Thomas (en)
- Alito (en)
- 13 (xsd:integer)
- Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
- Because Brumfield satisfied §2254’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
- Roberts (en)
- Roberts, Scalia, Alito (en)
- Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (en)
- U.S. Const. amend. VIII; (en)
- Brumfield v. Cain (en)
- Sotomayor (en)
- Supreme Court (en)
- 172800.0
- 25920.0
- 25920.0
- 305 (xsd:integer)
- 576 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbc:History_of_Baton_Rouge,_Louisiana
- dbc:United_States_death_penalty_case_law
- dbc:2015_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_disability_case_law
- dbc:Capital_punishment_in_Louisiana
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- Brumfield v. Cain, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that because Brumfield satisfied 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2)’s requirements, he was entitled to have his Atkins v. Virginia claim considered on the merits in federal court. (en)
- Brumfield v. Cain (en)
- freebase:Brumfield v. Cain
- yago-res:Brumfield v. Cain
- wikidata:Brumfield v. Cain
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/y2EU
- (en)
- Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Amir_Ali_(lawyer)
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_on_capital_punishment
- dbr:Timeline_of_disability_rights_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Brumfield_v_Cain
- dbr:Kevan_Brumfield
- dbr:West_Paul
- dbr:Henri_Broadway
is foaf:primaryTopic of