| dbo:abstract |
El dilema discursivo o la paradoja doctrinal es una paradoja de la teoría de la elección social. La paradoja es que la agregación de juicios con la mayoría de votos puede resultar en juicios contradictorios. (es) Discursive dilemma or doctrinal paradox is a paradox in social choice theory. The paradox is that aggregating judgments with majority voting can result in self-contradictory judgments. Consider a community voting on road repairs asked three questions; the repairs go ahead if all three answers are 'Yes'. The questions are: "Are the roads important?", "Is the weather right for road repair?" and "Are there available funds for repairs?" Imagine that three (non-overlapping) groups of 20% of people vote 'No' for each question, and everyone else votes 'Yes'. Then each question has an 80% agreement of 'Yes', so the repairs go ahead. However, now consider the situation where the community are asked one question: "Are all three conditions (importance, weather and funds) met?" Now 60% of people disagree with one of these conditions, so only 40% agree on a 'Yes' vote. In this case, the repairs do not go ahead. Thus the road repair team gets different feedback depending on how they poll their community. Philosopher Philip Pettit believes the discursive dilemma makes it impossible to make simple statements about the beliefs of a collective. (en) |
| dbo:thumbnail |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Jury_international01.jpg?width=300 |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/665/1/AGG2.pdf http://personal.lse.ac.uk/LIST/doctrinalparadox.htm |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
16136723 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
6128 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
992059391 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbc:Social_epistemology dbc:Dilemmas dbr:Condorcet_paradox dbc:Social_choice_theory dbr:Paradox dbr:Diffusion_of_responsibility dbr:Social_choice_theory dbc:Paradoxes dbr:Collective_responsibility dbr:Sociology dbr:Majority_voting dbr:Arrow's_theorem dbr:File:Jury_international01.jpg |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:PhilPapers dbt:Reflist |
| dct:subject |
dbc:Social_epistemology dbc:Dilemmas dbc:Social_choice_theory dbc:Paradoxes |
| gold:hypernym |
dbr:Paradox |
| rdf:type |
yago:WikicatParadoxes yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Attribute100024264 yago:CognitiveState105669934 yago:Communication100033020 yago:Condition113920835 yago:Confusion105683582 yago:Contradiction107206887 yago:Dilemma105686086 yago:Falsehood106756407 yago:Message106598915 yago:Paradox106724559 yago:Perplexity105685363 yago:PsychologicalState114373582 yago:State100024720 yago:Statement106722453 yago:WikicatDilemmas |
| rdfs:comment |
El dilema discursivo o la paradoja doctrinal es una paradoja de la teoría de la elección social. La paradoja es que la agregación de juicios con la mayoría de votos puede resultar en juicios contradictorios. (es) Discursive dilemma or doctrinal paradox is a paradox in social choice theory. The paradox is that aggregating judgments with majority voting can result in self-contradictory judgments. Consider a community voting on road repairs asked three questions; the repairs go ahead if all three answers are 'Yes'. The questions are: "Are the roads important?", "Is the weather right for road repair?" and "Are there available funds for repairs?" Imagine that three (non-overlapping) groups of 20% of people vote 'No' for each question, and everyone else votes 'Yes'. Then each question has an 80% agreement of 'Yes', so the repairs go ahead. However, now consider the situation where the community are asked one question: "Are all three conditions (importance, weather and funds) met?" Now 60% of people disag (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Dilema discursivo (es) Discursive dilemma (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Discursive dilemma yago-res:Discursive dilemma wikidata:Discursive dilemma dbpedia-es:Discursive dilemma dbpedia-fa:Discursive dilemma dbpedia-hu:Discursive dilemma https://global.dbpedia.org/id/53xgv |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Discursive_dilemma?oldid=992059391&ns=0 |
| foaf:depiction |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Jury_international01.jpg |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Discursive_dilemma |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Doctrinal_paradox dbr:Discursive_paradox dbr:Judgement_aggregation |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Belief_revision dbr:Index_of_philosophy_articles_(D–H) dbr:Condorcet_paradox dbr:Mathematical_theory_of_democracy dbr:Collective dbr:Collective_punishment dbr:Doctrinal_paradox dbr:Discursive_paradox dbr:Judgement_aggregation |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Discursive_dilemma |
