| dbo:abstract |
Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040, is a 2009 court opinion in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the standing requirements necessary for private plaintiffs to bring suit under the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 15 U.S.C. ch. 103, as well as the scope of the CAN-SPAM Act's federal preemption. Prior to this case, the CAN-SPAM Act's standing requirements had not been addressed at the Court of Appeals level, and only the Fourth Circuit had addressed the CAN-SPAM Act's preemptive scope. (en) |
| dbo:thumbnail |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St..._Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300 |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://web.archive.org/web/20091213172247/http:/spamnotes.com/2009/08/06/gordon-v-virtumundo--9th-cir-smacks-down-antispammers-in-trifecta.aspx%3Fref=rss https://web.archive.org/web/20110703161453/http:/www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2009/08/06/07-35487.pdf http://dockets.justia.com/docket/washington/wawdce/2:2006cv01284/138249/ |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
34645194 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
20992 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1088873709 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Melaleuca,_Inc._v._Hansen dbc:Spamming dbr:Richard_C._Tallman dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Idaho dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Washington dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Internet_case_law dbr:Consuelo_Callahan dbr:Collateral_estoppel dbr:GoDaddy dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Ronald_Gould_(judge) dbr:Federal_preemption dbr:Standing_(law) dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases dbr:CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003 dbr:Domain_name_registrar dbr:Lawsuit dbr:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act dbr:Federal_Trade_Commission dbr:Cause_of_action dbr:Legal_remedy dbr:Statutory_damages dbr:Internet_service_providers dbr:Attorneys_general dbr:Web_hosting_service dbr:Settlement_(litigation) dbr:Summary_judgment dbr:Plaintiff dbr:Spam_(electronic) dbr:Statute dbr:State_law_(US) dbr:California_Court_of_Appeal |
| dbp:align |
left (en) |
| dbp:appealedFrom |
dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Washington |
| dbp:appealedTo |
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit |
| dbp:bgcolor |
#F9F9F9 (en) |
| dbp:border |
0.800000 (xsd:double) |
| dbp:citations |
25920.0 |
| dbp:court |
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit |
| dbp:dateDecided |
2009-08-06 (xsd:date) |
| dbp:decisionBy |
dbr:Richard_C._Tallman |
| dbp:fontsize |
75 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:fullName |
Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc. (en) |
| dbp:holding |
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for lack of standing. (en) |
| dbp:judges |
Ronald Gould, Richard Tallman, and Consuelo Callahan (en) |
| dbp:keywords |
dbr:CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003 dbr:Spam_(electronic) |
| dbp:name |
Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc. (en) |
| dbp:numberOfJudges |
3 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:priorActions |
Gordon v. Virumundo, Inc., No. 06-0204-JCC, 2007 WL 1459395 (en) |
| dbp:quote |
This chapter supersedes any statute, regulation, or rule of a state or political subdivision of a State that expressly regulates the use of electronic mail to send commercial messages, except to the extent that any such statute, regulation, or rule prohibits falsity or deception in any portion of a commercial electronic mail message attached thereto. (en) The term "Internet access service" means a service that enables users to access content, information, electronic mail, or other services offered over the Internet, and may also include access to proprietary content, information, and other services as part of a package of services offered to consumers. Such term does not include telecommunications services. (en) |
| dbp:source |
— 15 U.S.C. § 7707 (en) — 47 U.S.C. § 231 (en) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Quote_box dbt:USC dbt:Usc-title-chap dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:Spamming dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Internet_case_law dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases |
| rdf:type |
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity |
| rdfs:comment |
Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc., 575 F.3d 1040, is a 2009 court opinion in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the standing requirements necessary for private plaintiffs to bring suit under the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, or CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, 15 U.S.C. ch. 103, as well as the scope of the CAN-SPAM Act's federal preemption. Prior to this case, the CAN-SPAM Act's standing requirements had not been addressed at the Court of Appeals level, and only the Fourth Circuit had addressed the CAN-SPAM Act's preemptive scope. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc. (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc. wikidata:Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/etQd |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Gordon_v._Virtumundo,_Inc.?oldid=1088873709&ns=0 |
| foaf:depiction |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Gordon_v._Virtumundo,_Inc. |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Gordon_v._Virtumundo |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Melaleuca,_Inc._v._Hansen dbr:Email_spam dbr:Spamming dbr:Gordon_v._Virtumundo |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Gordon_v._Virtumundo,_Inc. |
