| dbo:abstract |
Goss v Chilcott [1996] UKPC 17 (23 May 1996) is a decision of the Privy Council on appeal from New Zealand relating to the law of restitution, and in particular the requirements of total failure of consideration in relation to loans where some repayments had been made, and the defence of change of position. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
48845750 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
13199 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1046791462 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Robin_Cooke,_Baron_Cooke_of_Thorndon dbr:John_Simon,_1st_Viscount_Simon dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council dbr:Robert_Goff,_Baron_Goff_of_Chieveley dbr:Charles_Jauncey,_Baron_Jauncey_of_Tullichettle dbr:Void_(law) dbr:Undue_influence dbr:Graham_Virgo dbr:Liquidation dbr:Board_of_directors dbr:Common_law dbr:Law_of_New_Zealand dbr:Liquidator_(law) dbr:Loan dbr:Failure_of_consideration dbc:1996_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:1996_in_case_law dbc:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_New_Zealand dbr:Johan_Steyn,_Baron_Steyn dbr:Fibrosa_Spolka_Akcyjna_v_Fairbairn_Lawson_Combe_Barbour_Ltd dbr:New_Zealand dbr:Change_of_position dbr:Leonard_Hoffmann,_Baron_Hoffmann dbr:Obiter_dictum dbr:Money_had_and_received dbr:Restitution dbr:Pigot's_Case dbr:David_Securities_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth_Bank_of_Australia |
| dbp:appealedFrom |
[1995] 1 NZLR 263 (en) |
| dbp:citations |
[1996] UKPC 17, [1996] AC 788 (en) |
| dbp:court |
dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council |
| dbp:dateDecided |
1996-05-23 (xsd:date) |
| dbp:decisionBy |
Lord Goff of Chieveley (en) |
| dbp:fullName |
Murray Goss, and Jennifer Goss v Laurence Chilcott, and Central Acceptance Limited (en) |
| dbp:imagesize |
200 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:judges |
dbr:Robin_Cooke,_Baron_Cooke_of_Thorndon dbr:Robert_Goff,_Baron_Goff_of_Chieveley dbr:Charles_Jauncey,_Baron_Jauncey_of_Tullichettle dbr:Johan_Steyn,_Baron_Steyn dbr:Leonard_Hoffmann,_Baron_Hoffmann |
| dbp:keywords |
restitution, failure of consideration, change of position (en) |
| dbp:name |
Goss v Chilcott (en) |
| dbp:numberOfJudges |
5 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Cquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dct:subject |
dbc:1996_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:1996_in_case_law dbc:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_New_Zealand |
| gold:hypernym |
dbr:Decision |
| rdf:type |
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
Goss v Chilcott [1996] UKPC 17 (23 May 1996) is a decision of the Privy Council on appeal from New Zealand relating to the law of restitution, and in particular the requirements of total failure of consideration in relation to loans where some repayments had been made, and the defence of change of position. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Goss v Chilcott (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
wikidata:Goss v Chilcott https://global.dbpedia.org/id/2H6GZ |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Goss_v_Chilcott?oldid=1046791462&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Goss_v_Chilcott |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:VTB_Capital_plc_v_Nutritek_International_Corp dbr:Haugesund_Kommune_v_DEPFA_ACS_Bank dbr:Failure_of_consideration dbr:List_of_Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases dbr:Pigot's_Case |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Goss_v_Chilcott |