dbo:abstract |
In re Boucher (case citation: No. 2:06-mJ-91, 2009 WL 424718), is a federal criminal case in Vermont, which was the first to directly address the question of whether investigators can compel a suspect to reveal their encryption passphrase or password, despite the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. A magistrate judge held that producing the passphrase would constitute self-incrimination. In its submission on appeal to the District Court, the Government stated that it does not seek the password for the encrypted hard drive, but only sought to force Boucher to produce the contents of his encrypted hard drive in an unencrypted format by opening the drive before the grand jury. A District Court judge agreed with the government, holding that, given Boucher's initial cooperation in showing some of the content of his computer to border agents, producing the complete contents would not constitute self-incrimination. In late 2009, Boucher finally gave up his password and investigators found numerous images and videos depicting sexual abuse of children. In January 2010, Boucher was sentenced to 3 years in prison and deported. (en) |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
http://privacylaw.proskauer.com/2008/10/articles/international/uk-court-parts-with-us-court-regarding-compelled-disclosure-of-encryption-keys/ http://www.volokh.com/files/Boucher.pdf https://ecf.vtd.uscourts.gov/doc1/1851273316 https://web.archive.org/web/20150810023445/http:/federalevidence.com/node/1393 https://web.archive.org/web/20150915172641/http:/federalevidence.com/node/368 https://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2008-02-07-encrypted-laptop-child-porn_N.htm http://jolt.richmond.edu/v2i1/sergienko.html http://www.lawtechjournal.com/articles/2004/02_040413_clemens.php http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9834495-38.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9854034-38.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/15/AR2008011503663.html%3Fnav=hcmodule http://federalevidence.com/pdf/2009/03-March/InreBoucherI.pdf |
dbo:wikiPageID |
14732436 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength |
10566 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1111743953 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Encryption dbc:Disk_encryption dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Vermont dbr:United_States_magistrate_judge dbr:United_States_v._Fricosu dbr:United_States_v._Hubbell dbr:Vermont dbr:Defendant dbr:Criminal_law dbr:Child_pornography dbr:Subpoena dbr:Federal_law dbr:Key_(cryptography) dbr:Key_disclosure_law dbr:PACER_(law) dbr:Password dbc:United_States_Fifth_Amendment_self-incrimination_case_law dbr:USA_Today dbr:William_K._Sessions_III dbr:Legal_case dbc:Cryptography_law dbr:Laptop_computer dbc:Digital_forensics dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Case_citation dbr:Self-incrimination dbr:In_re dbr:Passphrase dbr:United_States_v._Arnold dbr:PGP_Disk dbr:William_K._Sessions dbr:Derby_Line dbr:U.S._Constitution dbr:Jerome_Niedermeier |
dbp:court |
dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Vermont |
dbp:dateDecided |
Feb 19, 2009 (en) |
dbp:fullName |
In re Grand Jury Subpoena to Sebastien Boucher (en) |
dbp:holding |
* Boucher's motion to quash the subpoena was denied. He was ordered to provide an unencrypted version of the hard drive in question. *The Government's appeal of the Magistrate Judge's opinion and order is sustained. (en) |
dbp:judge |
dbr:William_K._Sessions_III |
dbp:keywords |
dbr:Encryption dbr:Self-incrimination |
dbp:name |
In re Boucher (en) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Blockquote dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Cite_news dbt:Clear dbt:Portal dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_court dbt:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case |
dcterms:subject |
dbc:Disk_encryption dbc:United_States_Fifth_Amendment_self-incrimination_case_law dbc:Cryptography_law dbc:Digital_forensics |
gold:hypernym |
dbr:Case |
rdf:type |
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
rdfs:comment |
In re Boucher (case citation: No. 2:06-mJ-91, 2009 WL 424718), is a federal criminal case in Vermont, which was the first to directly address the question of whether investigators can compel a suspect to reveal their encryption passphrase or password, despite the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination. A magistrate judge held that producing the passphrase would constitute self-incrimination. In its submission on appeal to the District Court, the Government stated that it does not seek the password for the encrypted hard drive, but only sought to force Boucher to produce the contents of his encrypted hard drive in an unencrypted format by opening the drive before the grand jury. A District Court judge agreed with the government, holding that, given Boucher (en) |
rdfs:label |
In re Boucher (en) |
owl:sameAs |
freebase:In re Boucher wikidata:In re Boucher https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4nK5G |
prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:In_re_Boucher?oldid=1111743953&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:In_re_Boucher |
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of |
dbr:Boucher |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:United_States_v._Boucher dbr:US_v._Boucher dbr:U.S._v._Boucher dbr:U._S._v._Boucher |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Pretty_Good_Privacy dbr:United_States_v._Cotterman dbr:United_States_v._Fricosu dbr:United_States_v._Hubbell dbr:Key_disclosure_law dbr:Disk_encryption dbr:Boucher dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:United_States_v._Kirschner dbr:United_States_v._Boucher dbr:US_v._Boucher dbr:U.S._v._Boucher dbr:U._S._v._Boucher |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:In_re_Boucher |