| dbo:abstract |
In re Schrader, 22 F.3d 290 (Fed. Cir. 1994) is a 1994 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in which the court summarized and synthesized its precedents under the Freeman-Walter-Abele Test of patent eligibility. Under this test a key element is that the claimed invention is implemented with some type of hardware—that is, a particular machine. This was one of the last Federal Circuit decisions using that test. (en) |
| dbo:thumbnail |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St...for_the_Federal_Circuit.svg?width=300 |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
http://digital-law-online.info/cases/30PQ2D1455.htm http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/22/290/579716/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13993969979658295934 https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/668303/in-re-rex-d-schrader-and-eugene-d-klingaman/ https://openjurist.org/22/f3d/290 |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
46902169 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
16103 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1087851015 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Bilski_v._Kappos dbc:1994_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Pauline_Newman dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit dbr:S._Jay_Plager dbr:AT&T_Corp._v._Excel_Communications,_Inc. dbr:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International dbr:Proof_by_exhaustion dbr:Haldane_Robert_Mayer dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbc:Software_patent_case_law dbr:Freeman-Walter-Abele_Test dbr:In_re_Bilski dbr:F.3d dbr:U.S.P.Q.2d |
| dbp:case |
25920.0 (dbd:second) |
| dbp:citations |
17280.0 (dbd:second) |
| dbp:court |
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit |
| dbp:courtlistener |
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/668303/in-re-rex-d-schrader-and-eugene-d-klingaman/ |
| dbp:courtseal |
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.svg (en) |
| dbp:decidedate |
0001-04-13 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:decideyear |
1994 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:dissent |
Newman (en) |
| dbp:joinmajority |
Mayer (en) |
| dbp:judges |
dbr:Pauline_Newman dbr:S._Jay_Plager dbr:Haldane_Robert_Mayer |
| dbp:justia |
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/22/290/579716/ |
| dbp:litigants |
In re Schrader (en) |
| dbp:majority |
Plager (en) |
| dbp:otherSource |
Google Scholar (en) OpenJurist (en) Digital Law Online (en) |
| dbp:otherUrl |
http://digital-law-online.info/cases/30PQ2D1455.htm https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13993969979658295934 https://openjurist.org/22/f3d/290 |
| dbp:subsequent |
0001-05-05 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist |
| dct:subject |
dbc:1994_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbc:Software_patent_case_law |
| gold:hypernym |
dbr:Decision |
| rdf:type |
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
In re Schrader, 22 F.3d 290 (Fed. Cir. 1994) is a 1994 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in which the court summarized and synthesized its precedents under the Freeman-Walter-Abele Test of patent eligibility. Under this test a key element is that the claimed invention is implemented with some type of hardware—that is, a particular machine. This was one of the last Federal Circuit decisions using that test. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
In re Schrader (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:In re Schrader wikidata:In re Schrader https://global.dbpedia.org/id/xyR5 |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:In_re_Schrader?oldid=1087851015&ns=0 |
| foaf:depiction |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St...f_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.svg |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:In_re_Schrader |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Freeman-Walter-Abele_Test dbr:In_re_Lowry |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:In_re_Schrader |
