Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc., 153 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1998), was a copyright case about the Russian language weekly Russian Kurier in New York City that had copied and published various materials from Russian newspapers and news agency reports of Itar-TASS. The case was ultimately decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The decision was widely commented upon and the case is considered a landmark case because the court defined rules applicable in the U.S. on the extent to which the copyright laws of the country of origin or those of the U.S. apply in international disputes over copyright. The court held that to determine whether a claimant actually held the copyright on a work, the laws of the country of origin usually applied (more precis

thumbnail

Property Value
dbo:abstract Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc., 153 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1998), was a copyright case about the Russian language weekly Russian Kurier in New York City that had copied and published various materials from Russian newspapers and news agency reports of Itar-TASS. The case was ultimately decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The decision was widely commented upon and the case is considered a landmark case because the court defined rules applicable in the U.S. on the extent to which the copyright laws of the country of origin or those of the U.S. apply in international disputes over copyright. The court held that to determine whether a claimant actually held the copyright on a work, the laws of the country of origin usually applied (more precisely: "copyright is a form of property" and under the Second Restatement's approach, the governing law is "determined by the law of the state with 'the most significant relationship' to the property and to the parties"), but that to decide whether a copyright infringement had occurred and for possible remedies, the laws of the country where the infringement was claimed applied (lex loci delicti). (en)
dbo:thumbnail wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St..._for_the_Second_Circuit.svg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/886/1120/1796411/ https://web.archive.org/web/20060103031637/http:/www.abanet.org/intlaw/committees/disputes/litigation/Russianparties.pdf https://openjurist.org/153/f3d/82
dbo:wikiPageID 227947 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 16446 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1060225698 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Procedural_justice dbr:Berne_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Literary_and_Artistic_Works dbr:Jon_O._Newman dbr:Joseph_M._McLaughlin dbr:United_States dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:United_States_dollar dbr:Defendant dbr:Lex_loci_delicti_commissi dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_lawsuits dbr:Russia dbr:Russian_language dbc:Russia–United_States_relations dbr:General_Agreement_on_Tariffs_and_Trade dbr:Copyright dbr:Copyright_formalities dbr:Copyright_in_compilation dbr:Copyright_infringement dbr:Copyright_registration dbr:CCH_(company) dbr:Wilfred_Feinberg dbr:2d_Cir. dbr:American_Bar_Association dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:Russian-language_mass_media_in_the_United_States dbr:Court_of_appeals dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Arbitration_of_Russia dbr:Court_of_Cassation_(France) dbr:Feist_v._Rural dbc:1998_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Threshold_of_originality dbr:Soyuzmultfilm dbr:Copyright_law dbr:New_York_City dbr:Case_citation dbr:Case_law dbr:Information_Telegraph_Agency_of_Russia dbr:Preliminary_injunction dbr:Plaintiff dbr:Uruguay_Round dbr:Restatement_(Second)_of_Contracts dbr:Uruguay_Round_Agreement_Act dbr:Russian_copyright_law dbr:S.D.N.Y. dbr:Bridgeman_Art_Library,_Ltd._v._Corel_Corp. dbr:F.3d dbr:F._Supp. dbr:TRIPS dbr:U.S._Copyright_Office dbr:Films_by_Jove_Inc._v._Berov dbr:London_Film_Productions,_Ltd._v._Intercontinental_Communications,_Inc. dbr:Union_of_Journalists_of_Russia
dbp:arguedate 0001-12-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear 1997 (xsd:integer)
dbp:citations 17280.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:court dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
dbp:courtseal Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.svg (en)
dbp:decidedate 0001-08-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear 1998 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname Itar-Tass Russian News Agency, et al v. Russian Kurier, Inc., et al (en)
dbp:joinmajority Feinberg, McLaughlin (en)
dbp:judges dbr:Jon_O._Newman dbr:Joseph_M._McLaughlin dbr:Wilfred_Feinberg
dbp:litigants Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. (en)
dbp:majority Newman (en)
dbp:prior 886 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Russia–United_States_relations dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Note_label dbt:Ref_label dbt:Wikisource dbt:USCopyrightActs
dct:subject dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_lawsuits dbc:Russia–United_States_relations dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:Russian-language_mass_media_in_the_United_States dbc:1998_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type yago:WikicatUnitedStatesCourtsOfAppealsCasesRedirects yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Assembly108163792 yago:Court108329453 yago:Gathering107975026 yago:Group100031264 yago:SocialGroup107950920
rdfs:comment Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc., 153 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1998), was a copyright case about the Russian language weekly Russian Kurier in New York City that had copied and published various materials from Russian newspapers and news agency reports of Itar-TASS. The case was ultimately decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The decision was widely commented upon and the case is considered a landmark case because the court defined rules applicable in the U.S. on the extent to which the copyright laws of the country of origin or those of the U.S. apply in international disputes over copyright. The court held that to determine whether a claimant actually held the copyright on a work, the laws of the country of origin usually applied (more precis (en)
rdfs:label Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs freebase:Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. wikidata:Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4nycQ yago-res:Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Itar-Tass_Russian_News_Agency_v._Russian_Kurier,_Inc.?oldid=1060225698&ns=0
foaf:depiction wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St...of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit.svg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Itar-Tass_Russian_News_Agency_v._Russian_Kurier,_Inc.
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of dbr:Kurier_(disambiguation)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:153_F.3d_82 dbr:Itar-Tass_v._Russian_Kurier dbr:Itar-Tass_vs._Russian_Kurier dbr:Russian_Kurier
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:List_of_copyright_case_law dbr:153_F.3d_82 dbr:Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp. dbr:TASS dbr:Kurier_(disambiguation) dbr:Itar-Tass_v._Russian_Kurier dbr:Itar-Tass_vs._Russian_Kurier dbr:Russian_Kurier
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Itar-Tass_Russian_News_Agency_v._Russian_Kurier,_Inc.