Judge–advisor system (original) (raw)
Un sistema de decisión juez-asesor ( JAS, por sus siglas en inglés) es un tipo de asesoramiento y decisión que a menudo se estudia en la investigación del asesoramiento como un subconjunto de la toma de decisiones en las ciencias sociales. Los dos roles en un JAS son los roles de juez y asesor. El juez es el que toma las decisiones, evalúa la información relacionada con una decisión en particular y hace el juicio final sobre el resultado de la decisión. El asesor es una persona que brinda consejos, información o sugerencias al juez.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| dbo:abstract | A judge–advisor system (JAS) is a type of advice structure often studied in advice taking research, a subset of decision-making in the social sciences. The two roles in a JAS are the judge and advisor roles. The judge is the decision maker who evaluates information concerning a particular decision and makes the final judgment on the decision outcome. The advisor is an individual who provides advice, information, or suggestions to the judge. A key component of the dynamics in a JAS is the differentiation between the two roles in that while the advisor provides input to the decision, actual decision-making power resides solely with the judge. This one person decision power differentiates the JAS and related models such as Hollenbeck's Hierarchical Decision-Making Team model from more widely studied models where the final decision is mutually decided upon by the team as a whole. While JASs can be most easily thought of as between superiors and subordinates (such as in student–advisor or worker–manager relationships), differential social or power standings are not necessary. All that is required is that only one individual (the judge) has the final say in the decision outcome; all other input given to the judge may be taken under consideration but need not be acted on. Therefore, even a situation where a friend receives advice from a peer can be considered a JAS. Though examples of JASs are prevalent in real-world settings, they are studied most frequently in laboratory experiments in which judge/advisor roles are randomly assigned and situations/variables are manipulated at a between-subjects level. Such manipulations allow for a systematic study of the factors that affect how a judge reacts and responds to advisor advice. (en) Un sistema de decisión juez-asesor ( JAS, por sus siglas en inglés) es un tipo de asesoramiento y decisión que a menudo se estudia en la investigación del asesoramiento como un subconjunto de la toma de decisiones en las ciencias sociales. Los dos roles en un JAS son los roles de juez y asesor. El juez es el que toma las decisiones, evalúa la información relacionada con una decisión en particular y hace el juicio final sobre el resultado de la decisión. El asesor es una persona que brinda consejos, información o sugerencias al juez. (es) |
| dbo:wikiPageID | 33377451 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength | 27657 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1071784090 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:Decision-making dbr:Decision_theory dbr:Industrial_and_organizational_psychology dbr:Normative_social_influence dbr:Hot-cold_empathy_gap dbr:Forecasting dbr:Norm_(social) dbr:Framing_(social_sciences) dbr:Legal_advice dbr:Advice_(opinion) dbc:Advice_(opinion) dbc:Decision-making dbr:Collaborative_software dbr:Egocentric_bias dbr:Solyndra dbr:Group_decision_making dbr:Organizational_psychology dbr:Random_assignment dbr:Social_sciences dbr:Sunk_costs dbr:Anchoring dbr:Individual_differences_psychology |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Reflist |
| dct:subject | dbc:Advice_(opinion) dbc:Decision-making |
| gold:hypernym | dbr:Structure |
| rdf:type | dbo:Building |
| rdfs:comment | Un sistema de decisión juez-asesor ( JAS, por sus siglas en inglés) es un tipo de asesoramiento y decisión que a menudo se estudia en la investigación del asesoramiento como un subconjunto de la toma de decisiones en las ciencias sociales. Los dos roles en un JAS son los roles de juez y asesor. El juez es el que toma las decisiones, evalúa la información relacionada con una decisión en particular y hace el juicio final sobre el resultado de la decisión. El asesor es una persona que brinda consejos, información o sugerencias al juez. (es) A judge–advisor system (JAS) is a type of advice structure often studied in advice taking research, a subset of decision-making in the social sciences. The two roles in a JAS are the judge and advisor roles. The judge is the decision maker who evaluates information concerning a particular decision and makes the final judgment on the decision outcome. The advisor is an individual who provides advice, information, or suggestions to the judge. A key component of the dynamics in a JAS is the differentiation between the two roles in that while the advisor provides input to the decision, actual decision-making power resides solely with the judge. This one person decision power differentiates the JAS and related models such as Hollenbeck's Hierarchical Decision-Making Team model from more widely (en) |
| rdfs:label | Sistema de decisión juez-asesor (es) Judge–advisor system (en) |
| owl:sameAs | freebase:Judge–advisor system wikidata:Judge–advisor system dbpedia-es:Judge–advisor system https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4p5aN |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Judge–advisor_system?oldid=1071784090&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Judge–advisor_system |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:Judge-advisor_system dbr:Judge-Advisor_System_(JAS) dbr:Judge-advisor_system_(JAS) dbr:Judge–advisor_system_(JAS) |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Decision_support_system dbr:JAS dbr:Social_influence dbr:Crew dbr:Persuasion dbr:Legal_advice dbr:Advice_(opinion) dbr:Adviser dbr:Team dbr:Group_decision-making dbr:Judge-advisor_system dbr:Judge-Advisor_System_(JAS) dbr:Judge-advisor_system_(JAS) dbr:Judge–advisor_system_(JAS) |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Judge–advisor_system |