| dbo:abstract |
London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd [1993] 4 All ER 157 is an English land law case, concerning easements. It persuasively confirmed for one of the first times, obiter, that parking a car on land on its own could be the appropriate subject matter for an express easement. It established that an arrangement for a future extension of easement rights over specific other land would require a specific parcel of dominant land too. Simply agreeing that wherever any dominant land is extended (to an incertain extent) the easement on the servient land will be extended (even to a certain degree) is insufficient. (en) |
| dbo:thumbnail |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Co-op_car_park,_Oundl...ograph.org.uk_-_1164409.jpg?width=300 |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
35739368 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
4369 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1082977577 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:English_land_law dbr:English_property_law dbr:Contracts_(Rights_of_Third_Parties)_Act_1999 dbr:Easements dbc:1993_in_British_law dbc:1993_in_case_law dbr:The_Co-operative_Group dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbr:Ashburn_Anstalt_v_Arnold dbr:English_trusts_law dbr:Obiter_dictum |
| dbp:citations |
[1993] 4 All ER 157 (en) [1994] 1 WLR 31 (en) |
| dbp:court |
Court of Appeal (en) |
| dbp:dateDecided |
0001-05-25 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:judges |
Beldam LJ (en) Ralph Gibson LJ (en) Peter Gibson LJ (en) |
| dbp:keywords |
absence of applicable rights of third parties before the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (en) Reservation of easement (en) car parking (en) |
| dbp:name |
London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd (en) |
| dbp:opinions |
Held: L&B could not claim a car parking right for its additional land it had come by, because such an alleged dominant tenement was not adequately identified. The reason why there must be a dominant tenement before there can be a grant is because certainty is of prime importance. (en) |
| dbp:priorActions |
appellent also failed in the High Court. (en) |
| dbp:subsequentActions |
none (en) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Cquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Clist_easements dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dct:subject |
dbc:1993_in_British_law dbc:1993_in_case_law dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases |
| gold:hypernym |
dbr:Case |
| rdf:type |
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd [1993] 4 All ER 157 is an English land law case, concerning easements. It persuasively confirmed for one of the first times, obiter, that parking a car on land on its own could be the appropriate subject matter for an express easement. It established that an arrangement for a future extension of easement rights over specific other land would require a specific parcel of dominant land too. Simply agreeing that wherever any dominant land is extended (to an incertain extent) the easement on the servient land will be extended (even to a certain degree) is insufficient. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd wikidata:London and Blenheim Estates Ltd v Ladbroke Retail Parks Ltd https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4qf37 |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:London_and_Blenheim_Estates_Ltd_v_Ladb...etail_Parks_Ltd?oldid=1082977577&ns=0 |
| foaf:depiction |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Co-op_car_park,_Oundle_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1164409.jpg |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:London_and_Blenheim_Estates_Ltd_v_Ladbroke_Retail_Parks_Ltd |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:London_and_Blenheim_Ltd_v_Ladbroke_Ltd |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:London_and_Blenheim_Ltd_v_Ladbroke_Ltd |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:London_and_Blenheim_Estates_Ltd_v_Ladbroke_Retail_Parks_Ltd |
