| dbo:abstract |
Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales is a famous decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the modern common law rule of similar fact evidence originated. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/handle/10197/5351 |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
3160883 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
8681 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
959768013 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Extra_territorium_jus_dicenti_impune_non_paretur dbc:1894_in_case_law dbr:John_and_Sarah_Makin dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council dbr:Dominion dbr:Matthew_Henry_Stephen dbr:Alexander_Shand,_1st_Baron_Shand dbr:Edward_Morris,_1st_Baron_Morris dbc:1894_in_Australia dbr:Lord_Chancellor dbr:Chilling_effect dbr:Statute_of_Westminster_1931 dbr:Common_law dbr:William_Watson,_Baron_Watson dbr:Darlinghurst_Gaol dbr:Extraterritoriality dbr:Farrer_Herschell,_1st_Baron_Herschell dbr:Edward_Gibson,_1st_Baron_Ashbourne dbr:Edward_Macnaghten,_Baron_Macnaghten dbr:List_of_Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases dbr:Hanging dbr:Hardinge_Giffard,_1st_Earl_of_Halsbury dbr:Baby_farming dbc:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Australia dbr:Law_Reports_(New_South_Wales) dbr:Supreme_Court_of_New_South_Wales dbr:Appeal_Cases_Law_Reports dbr:Obiter_dictum dbr:Sweet_&_Maxwell dbr:Similar_fact_evidence dbr:Supreme_Court_of_NSW |
| dbp:appealedFrom |
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_New_South_Wales |
| dbp:court |
dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council |
| dbp:dateDecided |
0001-07-22 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:decisionBy |
Lord Herschell LC (en) |
| dbp:fullName |
John Makin, and Sarah Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales (en) |
| dbp:imagesize |
100 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:judges |
dbr:Alexander_Shand,_1st_Baron_Shand dbr:Edward_Morris,_1st_Baron_Morris dbr:Lord_Chancellor dbr:William_Watson,_Baron_Watson dbr:Farrer_Herschell,_1st_Baron_Herschell dbr:Edward_Gibson,_1st_Baron_Ashbourne dbr:Edward_Macnaghten,_Baron_Macnaghten dbr:Hardinge_Giffard,_1st_Earl_of_Halsbury |
| dbp:keywords |
dbr:Similar_fact_evidence |
| dbp:name |
Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales (en) |
| dbp:numberOfJudges |
7 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:1894_in_case_law dbc:1894_in_Australia dbc:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Australia |
| rdfs:comment |
Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales is a famous decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the modern common law rule of similar fact evidence originated. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales wikidata:Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4qmAU |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Makin_v_Attorney_General_for_New_South_Wales?oldid=959768013&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Makin_v_Attorney_General_for_New_South_Wales |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Makin_v._Attorney_General_for_New_South_Wales |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:John_and_Sarah_Makin dbr:Law_of_evidence_in_South_Africa dbr:Makin_v._Attorney_General_for_New_South_Wales |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Makin_v_Attorney_General_for_New_South_Wales |