Martin v. Mott (original) (raw)
Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| dbo:abstract | Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink | https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/85514/martin-v-mott/ |
| dbo:wikiPageID | 72099024 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength | 7108 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1118461215 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbr:Poughkeepsie dbr:President_of_the_United_States dbr:New_York_Supreme_Court dbr:Brennan_Center_for_Justice dbr:Joseph_Story dbr:Replevin dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Federalist_No._29 dbr:War_of_1812 dbr:Daniel_D._Tompkins dbr:James_Madison dbr:Court-martial dbr:Insurrection_Act_of_1807 dbr:Militia_(United_States) dbc:1827_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Militia_Act_of_1792 dbr:Militia_Act_of_1795 |
| dbp:argueyear | 1827 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:decidedate | 0001-02-19 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:decideyear | 1827 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:fullname | Martin, Plaintiff m Error, v. Mott, Defendant :n Error (en) |
| dbp:holding | Mott had no legal standing to disobey orders to assemble; President holds power to declare exigencies. (en) |
| dbp:litigants | Martin v. Mott (en) |
| dbp:prior | New York Supreme Court rules for Mott; brought to court on appeal. (en) |
| dbp:uspage | 19 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:usvol | 25 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist |
| dct:subject | dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1827_in_United_States_case_law |
| rdf:type | owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment | Martin v. Mott, 25 U.S. 19 (1827) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the president of the United States’ emergency powers and the authority to activate state militias for federal service. The court heard the case of Jacob E. Mott, a militia private who disobeyed orders to mobilize for service during the war of 1812 and then appealed his subsequent court-martial. The court’s ruling in the case against the militiaman had a significant impact on executive powers during national emergencies, according to legal scholars, and has been used to interpret the Insurrection Act of 1807. (en) |
| rdfs:label | Martin v. Mott (en) |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Martin_v._Mott?oldid=1118461215&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Martin_v._Mott |
| foaf:name | (en) Martin, Plaintiff m Error, v. Mott, Defendant :n Error (en) |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:Martin_v_Mott |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Insurrection_Act_of_1807 dbr:Martin_v_Mott |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Martin_v._Mott |