McQuiggin v. Perkins (original) (raw)
- McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that actual innocence, if proven, is sufficient to circumvent the one-year statute of limitations for petitioners to appeal their conviction enacted within the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) gives a state prisoner one year to file a federal habeas petition, starting from “the date on which the judgment became final.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244. But if the petition alleges newly discovered evidence, the filing deadline is one year from “the date on which the factual predicate of the claim . . . could have been discovered through . . . due diligence.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244. (en)
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=758745264684950503
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/383/
- https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4816214/11/perkins-233916-v-mcquiggin/
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/872995/mcquiggin-v-perkins/
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-126
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120301115
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-126
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-126_lkgn.pdf
- 44976276 (xsd:integer)
- 8324 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1025823297 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_569
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
- dbr:Antiterrorism_and_Effective_Death_Penalty_Act_of_1996
- dbr:Antonin_Scalia
- dbc:United_States_habeas_corpus_case_law
- dbr:6th_Cir.
- dbr:Actual_innocence
- dbr:Habeas_corpus
- dbc:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law
- dbr:Chad_Readler
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbc:United_States_federal_criminal_case_law
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Statute_of_limitations
- dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume
- dbr:W.D._Mich.
- dbr:Sixth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
- dbr:AEDPA
- dbr:F.3d
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- 0001-02-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2013 (xsd:integer)
- McQuiggin v. Perkins, (en)
- 0001-05-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2013 (xsd:integer)
- Scalia (en)
- 12 (xsd:integer)
- Greg McQuiggin, Warden, Petitioner v. Floyd Perkins (en)
- Actual innocence, if proved, serves as a gateway through which a petitioner may pass whether the impediment is a procedural bar or the expiration of the AEDPA statute of limitations. (en)
- Roberts, Thomas; Alito (en)
- Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
- McQuiggin v. Perkins (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
- Supreme Court (en)
- 172800.0
- 25920.0
- 383 (xsd:integer)
- 569 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbc:United_States_habeas_corpus_case_law
- dbc:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law
- dbc:United_States_federal_criminal_case_law
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that actual innocence, if proven, is sufficient to circumvent the one-year statute of limitations for petitioners to appeal their conviction enacted within the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). (en)
- McQuiggin v. Perkins (en)
- freebase:McQuiggin v. Perkins
- yago-res:McQuiggin v. Perkins
- wikidata:McQuiggin v. Perkins
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/oMRE
- (en)
- Greg McQuiggin, Warden, Petitioner v. Floyd Perkins (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of