Military capability (original) (raw)
Military capability is defined by the Australian Defence Force as "the ability to achieve a desired effect in a specific operating environment". It is defined by three interdependent factors: combat readiness, sustainable capability and force structure. Military capability is often referred to in terms of low, medium and high, although this usually refers to the type, quantity and sophistication of technology being used in combat operations, and the severity of threat to security of the state.
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract | Military capability is defined by the Australian Defence Force as "the ability to achieve a desired effect in a specific operating environment". It is defined by three interdependent factors: combat readiness, sustainable capability and force structure. In terms of technologies, weapons and equipment use, it represents assets, that exist to perform specific functions in relation to requirements of the statement about present or future military operations as derived from the national defence policy (strategic). A national Capabilities Development Plan seeks to provide a global understanding of capability needs, capability trends and potential capability shortfalls. Military capability is often referred to in terms of low, medium and high, although this usually refers to the type, quantity and sophistication of technology being used in combat operations, and the severity of threat to security of the state. Maintaining military capability requires modernisation of military technology, particularly prevalent in Europe since the Middle Ages due to the arms race that commenced with the introduction of artillery and later firearms into warfare. In the European Union, capability development is approached by the Capability Directorate focusing on three primary areas: * IAP: Information Acquisition & Processing - Knowledge * GEM: Guidance, Energy & Materials - Engagement * ESM: Environment, Systems & Modelling - Manoeuver Existing military capability in armed forces will be employed, and only minor enhancements are possible in a short conflict. The context within which the military capabilities are used such as the geography of the area of operations, the culture and demography of the enemy, and the preparedness of the opposing forces, generally can not be altered at the start of the conflict. It is a major part of military science to find methods of defeating the enemy with available capabilities using existing and new concepts. Successful use of military capability by employing these concepts and methods is reflected in the effects on the enemy ability to continue to resist, subject to Rules of Engagement (ROE) range of political, legal and ethical factors. Military capability is often tested in peacetime by using the scenario methodology to analyse performance, often as a war game. It is The military's strategic role is to advise civilian leadership on the capability of military forces to execute specific missions. Future military capability is developed based on the analysis of experimentation and testing of existing capability performance, and future capability decisions are made based on the armed forces being able to meet the challenges of a range of possible future scenarios. This is arguably a difficult task to accomplish due to the lack of predictability about future threats, changes in defence policy, and the range of response options and their effects that a government may want as a matter of future national defence policy. The difference between expected and deliverable military capabilities is called the military capability gap, although the same term is also sometimes used to compare capabilities of potential future belligerents. The vast majority of international relations studies and defense analyses assume that military power is a direct product of material resources, often measured in terms of the size of a state's defense budget, military forces, or gross domestic product (GDP). A growing body of research, however, claims that certain non-material factors significantly affect the ability of states to translate their resources into fighting power. (en) Kemampuan militer didefinisikan oleh sebagai "kemampuan untuk mencapai efek yang diinginkan dalam lingkungan operasi tertentu". Kemampuan militer didefinisikan oleh tiga faktor yang saling tergantung: , kemampuan berkelanjutan dan . Dalam hal teknologi, penggunaan senjata dan peralatan, kemampuan militer mewakili aset yang ada untuk melakukan fungsi khusus yang berhubungan dengan operasi militer sekarang atau di masa depan yang berasal dari (strategis). Rencana Pengembangan Kemampuan nasional berupaya memberikan pemahaman global tentang kebutuhan kemampuan, tren kemampuan, dan potensi kekurangan kemampuan. Kemampuan militer sering dikategorikan dalam istilah renadah, sedang dan tinggi, meskipun ini biasanya merujuk pada jenis, jumlah dan kecanggihan teknologi yang digunakan dalam suatu operasi tempur dan tingkat keparahan ancaman terhadap keamanan negara. (in) Воєнний потенціал — можливості держави чи коаліції держав утримувати й удосконалювати збройні сили, підвищувати їхню боєздатність, поповнювати навченими кадрами, забезпечувати сучасною зброєю та військовою технікою і всіма видами постачання в мирний і воєнний час. Бувши взаємопов'язаним з економічним, науково-технічним та морально-політичним потенціалом, воєнний безпосередньо проявляється у військовій могутності держави. Зміст воєнного потенціалу становлять: кількість і якість озброєння та військової техніки; ступінь забезпеченості військ матеріально-технічними засобами у розмірах, необхідних для ведення сучасної війни; кількість особового складу, його морально-політична, психологічна, загально-освітня, військова та військово-технічна підготовка; ступінь підготовленості командних кадрів; наявність навчених і готових до мобілізації резервів; рівень розробки воєнних доктрин і теорій; бойова готовність збройних сил; мобілізаційні можливості держави тощо. Всі компоненти воєнного потенціалу пов'язані між собою і взаємовпливають один на одного. Оснащення збройних сил ядерною зброєю надає воєнному потенціалу держави якісно нового значення. (uk) |
dbo:wikiPageID | 19053553 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength | 4938 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1124835125 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:Rules_of_Engagement dbr:Area_of_operations dbr:Military_budget dbr:Military_science dbr:Military_simulation dbr:Military_technology dbr:Arms_race dbr:Combat dbr:Combat_readiness dbr:Australian_Defence_Force dbr:European_Union dbr:Firearms dbr:Force_structure dbc:Military_terminology dbr:Artillery dbr:Warfare dbr:Military_intelligence dbr:Middle_Ages dbr:Operational_mobility dbr:National_defence_policy |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description |
dct:subject | dbc:Military_terminology |
rdfs:comment | Military capability is defined by the Australian Defence Force as "the ability to achieve a desired effect in a specific operating environment". It is defined by three interdependent factors: combat readiness, sustainable capability and force structure. Military capability is often referred to in terms of low, medium and high, although this usually refers to the type, quantity and sophistication of technology being used in combat operations, and the severity of threat to security of the state. (en) Kemampuan militer didefinisikan oleh sebagai "kemampuan untuk mencapai efek yang diinginkan dalam lingkungan operasi tertentu". Kemampuan militer didefinisikan oleh tiga faktor yang saling tergantung: , kemampuan berkelanjutan dan . Kemampuan militer sering dikategorikan dalam istilah renadah, sedang dan tinggi, meskipun ini biasanya merujuk pada jenis, jumlah dan kecanggihan teknologi yang digunakan dalam suatu operasi tempur dan tingkat keparahan ancaman terhadap keamanan negara. (in) Воєнний потенціал — можливості держави чи коаліції держав утримувати й удосконалювати збройні сили, підвищувати їхню боєздатність, поповнювати навченими кадрами, забезпечувати сучасною зброєю та військовою технікою і всіма видами постачання в мирний і воєнний час. Бувши взаємопов'язаним з економічним, науково-технічним та морально-політичним потенціалом, воєнний безпосередньо проявляється у військовій могутності держави. (uk) |
rdfs:label | Kemampuan militer (in) Military capability (en) Воєнний потенціал (uk) |
owl:sameAs | freebase:Military capability wikidata:Military capability dbpedia-bg:Military capability dbpedia-fa:Military capability dbpedia-id:Military capability dbpedia-uk:Military capability https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4rwJL |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Military_capability?oldid=1124835125&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Military_capability |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:Military_Capability dbr:Future_military_capabilities |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Royal_Australian_Corps_of_Transport dbr:Elements_of_national_security dbr:Defence_Staff_(Sweden) dbr:Espionage dbr:Concept_development_and_experimentation dbr:Military_organization dbr:Military_science dbr:Balance_of_power_(international_relations) dbr:82nd_Airborne_Division dbr:Fleet_Command_(Turkey) dbr:Force_structure dbr:Land_Environment_Air_Picture_Provision dbr:Military dbr:World_War_II dbr:Yaogan dbr:The_Next_100_Years:_A_Forecast_for_the_21st_Century dbr:Territorial_peace_theory dbr:Military_Capability dbr:Future_military_capabilities |
is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Military_capability |