| dbo:abstract |
Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that attorneys of criminal defendants have the duty to communicate plea bargains offered to the accused. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/566/134/%23tab-opinion-1970401 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-444 |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
61938571 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
6052 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1049472085 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_ineffective_assistance_of_counsel_case_law dbr:Premo_v._Moore dbr:Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Chris_Koster dbr:Missouri dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbr:Strickland_v._Washington dbr:State_court_(United_States) dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Missouri_Court_of_Appeals dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Missouri_Attorney_General dbr:Post_conviction dbr:Preliminary_hearing dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Plea_bargain dbr:Hill_v._Lockhart |
| dbp:arguedate |
0001-10-31 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:argueyear |
2011 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:decidedate |
0001-03-21 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:decideyear |
2012 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:dissent |
Scalia (en) |
| dbp:docket |
10 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:fullname |
Missouri v. Galin E. Frye (en) |
| dbp:holding |
"Defense counsel has the duty to communicate formal offers from the prosecution to accept a plea on terms and conditions that may be favorable to the accused." (en) |
| dbp:joindissent |
Roberts, Thomas, Alito (en) |
| dbp:joinmajority |
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan (en) |
| dbp:lawsapplied |
dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution |
| dbp:litigants |
Missouri v. Frye (en) |
| dbp:majority |
Kennedy (en) |
| dbp:opinionannouncement |
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/566/134/%23tab-opinion-1970401 |
| dbp:oralargument |
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-444 |
| dbp:parallelcitations |
172800.0 |
| dbp:uspage |
134 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:usvol |
566 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:US6thAmendment |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_ineffective_assistance_of_counsel_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law |
| rdf:type |
owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that attorneys of criminal defendants have the duty to communicate plea bargains offered to the accused. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Missouri v. Frye (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
wikidata:Missouri v. Frye https://global.dbpedia.org/id/C4CN6 |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Missouri_v._Frye?oldid=1049472085&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Missouri_v._Frye |
| foaf:name |
(en) Missouri v. Galin E. Frye (en) |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Missouri_v_Frye |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_ca...ing_constitutional_criminal_procedure dbr:Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel dbr:Lafler_v._Cooper dbr:Missouri_v_Frye |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Missouri_v._Frye |