Multimedia Web Ontology Language (original) (raw)
Machine interpretation of documents and services in Semantic Web environment is primarily enabled by (a) the capability to mark documents, document segments and services with semantic tags and (b) the ability to establish contextual relations between the tags with a domain model, which is formally represented as ontology. Human beings use natural languages to communicate an abstract view of the world. Natural language constructs are symbolic representations of human experience and are close to the conceptual model that Semantic Web technologies deal with. Thus, natural language constructs have been naturally used to represent the ontology elements. This makes it convenient to apply Semantic Web technologies in the domain of textual information. In contrast, multimedia documents are percept
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| dbo:abstract | Machine interpretation of documents and services in Semantic Web environment is primarily enabled by (a) the capability to mark documents, document segments and services with semantic tags and (b) the ability to establish contextual relations between the tags with a domain model, which is formally represented as ontology. Human beings use natural languages to communicate an abstract view of the world. Natural language constructs are symbolic representations of human experience and are close to the conceptual model that Semantic Web technologies deal with. Thus, natural language constructs have been naturally used to represent the ontology elements. This makes it convenient to apply Semantic Web technologies in the domain of textual information. In contrast, multimedia documents are perceptual recording of human experience. An attempt to use a conceptual model to interpret the perceptual records gets severely impaired by the semantic gap that exists between the perceptual media features and the conceptual world. Notably, the concepts have their roots in perceptual experience of human beings and the apparent disconnect between the conceptual and the perceptual world is rather artificial. The key to semantic processing of multimedia data lies in harmonizing the seemingly isolated conceptual and the perceptual worlds. Representation of the Domain knowledge needs to be extended to enable perceptual modeling, over and above conceptual modeling that is supported. The perceptual model of a domain primarily comprises observable media properties of the concepts. Such perceptual models are useful for semantic interpretation of media documents, just as the conceptual models help in the semantic interpretation of textual documents. Multimedia Ontology language (M-OWL) is an ontology representation language that enables such perceptual modeling. It assumes a causal model of the world, where observable media features are caused by underlying concepts. In MOWL, it is possible to associate different types of media features in different media format and at different levels of abstraction with the concepts in a closed domain. The associations are probabilistic in nature to account for inherent uncertainties in observation of media patterns. The spatial and temporal relations between the media properties characterizing a concept (or, event) can also be expressed using MOWL. Often the concepts in a domain inherit the media properties of some related concepts, such as a historic monument inheriting the color and texture properties of its building material. It is possible to reason with the media properties of the concepts in a domain to derive an Observation Model for a concept. Finally, MOWL supports an abductive reasoning framework using Bayesian networks, that is robust against imperfect observations of media data. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink | http://www.teriin.org/event http://www.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/iwi06/wi/ http://www.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/~cib/2013/Dec/article3/iib_vol14no1_article3.pdf https://www.academia.edu/770762/Ontology_specification_and_integration_for_multimedia_applications http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm%3Fid=1877922.1877932&coll=DL&dl=GUIDE&CFID=87655189&CFTOKEN=96323162 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm%3Fid=2069280 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm%3Fid=2559928.2542210&coll=DL&dl=GUIDE&CFID=324379634&CFTOKEN=68596156 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp%3Ftp=&arnumber=6690686&queryText%3DAn+ontology+based+personalized+garment+recommendation+system http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm%3Fid=1290067.1290075&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=90432420&CFTOKEN=38407543 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm%3Fid=1460676.1460686&coll=ACM&dl=ACM&CFID=90432420&CFTOKEN=38407543 http://www.isical.ac.in/~premi05/ |
| dbo:wikiPageID | 11988917 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength | 8958 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1059967239 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:MPEG-7 dbr:Ontology_for_Media_Resources dbr:Multimedia dbr:Conceptual_model dbr:Causal_model dbr:Web_Ontology_Language dbr:Domain_knowledge dbr:DAML+OIL dbr:Large_Scale_Concept_Ontology_for_Multimedia dbr:Abductive_reasoning dbr:Bayesian_networks dbc:Multimedia dbc:Semantic_Web dbc:Ontology_languages dbr:Ontology_(information_science) dbr:RDF_Schema dbr:XML dbr:Semantic_analysis_(computational) dbr:Natural_language dbr:Semantic_Web dbr:Semantic_gap |
| dbp:bot | InternetArchiveBot (en) |
| dbp:date | February 2018 (en) |
| dbp:fixAttempted | yes (en) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Dead_link dbt:Multiple_issues dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Technical |
| dct:subject | dbc:Multimedia dbc:Semantic_Web dbc:Ontology_languages |
| rdf:type | yago:WikicatOntologyLanguages yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Communication100033020 yago:Language106282651 |
| rdfs:comment | Machine interpretation of documents and services in Semantic Web environment is primarily enabled by (a) the capability to mark documents, document segments and services with semantic tags and (b) the ability to establish contextual relations between the tags with a domain model, which is formally represented as ontology. Human beings use natural languages to communicate an abstract view of the world. Natural language constructs are symbolic representations of human experience and are close to the conceptual model that Semantic Web technologies deal with. Thus, natural language constructs have been naturally used to represent the ontology elements. This makes it convenient to apply Semantic Web technologies in the domain of textual information. In contrast, multimedia documents are percept (en) |
| rdfs:label | Multimedia Web Ontology Language (en) |
| owl:sameAs | freebase:Multimedia Web Ontology Language yago-res:Multimedia Web Ontology Language wikidata:Multimedia Web Ontology Language https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4rrF6 |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Multimedia_Web_Ontology_Language?oldid=1059967239&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Multimedia_Web_Ontology_Language |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:MOWL |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Ontology_for_Media_Resources dbr:Web_Ontology_Language dbr:Large_Scale_Concept_Ontology_for_Multimedia dbr:MOWL |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Multimedia_Web_Ontology_Language |