dbo:abstract |
Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, 295 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. It affirmed that public use or commercialization of an invention more than one year prior to the filing date will cost the inventor his patent rights (see also 35 U.S.C. § 100-105). The inventor in this case was Allan M. Konrad, a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory employee who devised and implemented a method for accessing and searching data objects stored on a remote computer (U.S. patents 5,544,320; 5,696,901; 5,974,444). Netscape moved to invalidate Konrad's patents in U.S. district court immediately after Konrad filed a patent infringement suit against Netscape customers. The district court concluded that Konrad's patents were invalid because they did not meet the public-use and on-sale bar eligibility criteria of 35 U.S.C. § 102b.In particular, the district court found that Konrad (1) placed his invention in the public domain by demonstrating it to others without a confidentiality agreement and (2) tried to sell it to other legal entities, both more than one year before he filed for the patent. The appeals court, upon review, affirmed the district court decision for the same reasons. (en) |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/778288/netscape-communications-corporation-plaintiffcounterclaim-and-microsoft/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/295/1315/597227/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15836521221307364649 |
dbo:wikiPageID |
24455215 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength |
14905 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1026760169 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:On-sale_bar dbr:Patent_office dbr:Pauline_Newman dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit dbr:United_States_Department_of_Energy dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Texas dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:University_of_California dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbr:Patent_infringement dbr:United_States_patent_law dbr:Patent dbr:Public_domain dbr:Haldane_Robert_Mayer dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbc:2002_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Software_patent_case_law dbr:Lawrence_Berkeley_National_Laboratory dbr:Sharon_Prost dbr:Confidentiality_agreement dbc:Netscape_litigation dbr:U.S._Department_of_Energy dbr:Lawrence_Berkeley_Laboratory dbr:America_Online,_Inc. dbr:Microsoft_Corp. dbr:Stanford_Linear_Accelerator_Center dbr:Legal_precedent dbr:F.3d dbr:Netscape_Communications_Corp. dbr:U.S.P.Q.2d dbr:U.S._district_court dbr:Baxter_v._Cobe dbr:Group_One,_Ltd._v._Hallmark_Cards,_Inc. dbr:In_re_Caveney dbr:Lough_v._Brunswick_Corp. dbr:Petrolite_Corp._v._Baker_Hugher,_Inc. |
dbp:case |
25920.0 (dbd:second) |
dbp:citations |
17280.0 (dbd:second) |
dbp:court |
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit |
dbp:courtlistener |
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/778288/netscape-communications-corporation-plaintiffcounterclaim-and-microsoft/ |
dbp:decidedate |
0001-07-09 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
dbp:decideyear |
2002 (xsd:integer) |
dbp:fullname |
Netscape Communications Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, and America Online, Inc. v. Konrad (en) |
dbp:googlescholar |
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15836521221307364649 |
dbp:holding |
Konrad's patents are ineligible for patent protection in the United States because they were publicly used and commercialized more than one year prior to the patent filing date. (en) |
dbp:judges |
dbr:Pauline_Newman dbr:Haldane_Robert_Mayer dbr:Sharon_Prost |
dbp:justia |
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/295/1315/597227/ |
dbp:keywords |
dbr:On-sale_bar dbr:Patent |
dbp:litigants |
Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad (en) |
dbp:prior |
Finding for plaintiff, Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, No. 00-20789 (en) |
dbp:subsequent |
0001-08-02 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case |
dct:subject |
dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbc:2002_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Software_patent_case_law dbc:Netscape_litigation |
rdf:type |
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity |
rdfs:comment |
Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad, 295 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2002), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. It affirmed that public use or commercialization of an invention more than one year prior to the filing date will cost the inventor his patent rights (see also 35 U.S.C. § 100-105). The inventor in this case was Allan M. Konrad, a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory employee who devised and implemented a method for accessing and searching data objects stored on a remote computer (U.S. patents 5,544,320; 5,696,901; 5,974,444). Netscape moved to invalidate Konrad's patents in U.S. district court immediately after Konrad filed a patent infringement suit against Netscape customers. The district court concluded that Konrad's patents were invali (en) |
rdfs:label |
Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad (en) |
owl:sameAs |
freebase:Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad wikidata:Netscape Communications Corp. v. Konrad https://global.dbpedia.org/id/fRhC |
prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Netscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad?oldid=1026760169&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Netscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Netscape_Commc'ns_Corp._v._Konrad dbr:Netscape_v_konrad |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Legal_person dbr:Netscape_Commc'ns_Corp._v._Konrad dbr:Netscape_v_konrad |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Netscape_Communications_Corp._v._Konrad |