| dbo:abstract |
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26 is a UK constitutional law case in which an anonymised privacy injunction was obtained by a claimant, identified in court documents as "PJS", to prohibit publication of the details of a sexual encounter between him and two other people. Media outside England and Wales identified PJS as David Furnish. In January 2016, PJS applied to the High Court of Justice in London for an injunction to prevent publication of a news story relating to the encounter by The Sun on Sunday. That was declined on the basis that publication would be in the public interest. PJS applied to the Court of Appeal and was successful in overturning the High Court decision. In April 2016, the Court of Appeal ruled that the injunction should be lifted, as the allegations had been published widely abroad and online. PJS then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, which in May 2016 decided to uphold the injunction by a majority of 4–1. The case has led to debate about the effectiveness of injunctions in the age of the Internet and social media websites. (en) |
| dbo:thumbnail |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg?width=300 |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi%3Fdoc=/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2016/2770.html http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi%3Fdoc=/uk/cases/UKSC/2016/26.html http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2016/100.html https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pjs-v-news-group-newspapers-ltd.pdf |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
50158197 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
17732 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1116716211 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Canada dbr:Ross_Cranston dbr:Scotland dbr:David_Furnish dbc:Human_rights_case_law dbr:Anonymised_injunctions_in_English_law dbr:House_of_Commons_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Jonathan_Mance,_Baron_Mance dbr:Joshua_Rozenberg dbr:Paul_Staines dbr:Republic_of_Ireland dbr:United_States dbr:De_facto dbr:Internet dbr:Rupert_Jackson dbr:2011_British_privacy_injunctions_controversy dbc:Legal_history_of_the_United_Kingdom dbc:Twitter_controversies dbc:United_Kingdom_privacy_law dbr:Spycatcher dbc:Censorship_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Toronto_Star dbr:Twitter dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbc:United_Kingdom_free_speech_case_law dbr:King_Canute_and_the_tide dbr:Parliamentary_privilege dbc:2016_in_British_law dbc:2016_in_case_law dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbc:English_privacy_case_law dbc:United_Kingdom_constitutional_case_law dbr:John_Hemming_(politician) dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Article_10_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:Article_8_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights dbr:Mark_Warby dbc:The_Sun_(United_Kingdom) dbr:Social_media dbr:Hugh_Tomlinson dbr:News_UK dbr:CTB_v_News_Group_Newspapers dbr:Super-injunctions_in_English_law dbr:Tomlin_order dbr:Right_to_privacy dbr:UK_constitutional_law dbr:The_Sun_on_Sunday dbr:Lord_Toulson dbr:R_v_Wilkes |
| dbp:citations |
[2016] UKSC 26 (en) |
| dbp:court |
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom |
| dbp:dateDecided |
2016-05-19 (xsd:date) |
| dbp:fullName |
PJS v News Group Newspapers Limited (en) |
| dbp:keywords |
dbr:Right_to_privacy |
| dbp:name |
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd (en) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Blockquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Privacy_injunctions_in_English_law dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:Human_rights_case_law dbc:Legal_history_of_the_United_Kingdom dbc:Twitter_controversies dbc:United_Kingdom_privacy_law dbc:Censorship_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbc:United_Kingdom_free_speech_case_law dbc:2016_in_British_law dbc:2016_in_case_law dbc:English_privacy_case_law dbc:United_Kingdom_constitutional_case_law dbc:The_Sun_(United_Kingdom) |
| rdfs:comment |
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26 is a UK constitutional law case in which an anonymised privacy injunction was obtained by a claimant, identified in court documents as "PJS", to prohibit publication of the details of a sexual encounter between him and two other people. Media outside England and Wales identified PJS as David Furnish. The case has led to debate about the effectiveness of injunctions in the age of the Internet and social media websites. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
wikidata:PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd https://global.dbpedia.org/id/2HDeZ |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:PJS_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd?oldid=1116716211&ns=0 |
| foaf:depiction |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:PJS_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of |
dbr:PJS |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:PJS_v_News_Group_Newspapers |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:David_Furnish dbr:Queenstown_suppressed_indecency_case dbr:PJS dbr:2016_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Mosley_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd dbr:PJS_v_News_Group_Newspapers |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:PJS_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd |
