dbo:abstract |
R v Duarte, [1990] 1 SCR 30 is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Court held that a warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violated section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable. (en) 女皇訴杜阿爾特案(英語:R v Duarte,[1990] 1 SCR 30)是加拿大最高法院根據《加拿大權利與自由憲章》第8條就私隱權作出決定的主要案件。法院認為,無手令且秘密錄製私人通訊的影片違反了第8條。對話中只有一方的同意不足以成為合理的。 (zh) |
dbo:wikiPageID |
7360906 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength |
2833 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
955299873 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Peter_Cory dbr:United_States_v._White dbc:1990_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Criminal_Code_(Canada) dbc:Section_Eight_Charter_case_law dbr:Expectation_of_privacy dbr:Parliament_of_Canada dbr:Court_of_Appeal_for_Ontario dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms dbr:Right_to_privacy dbr:Lopez_v._United_States |
dbp:caseName |
R v Duarte (en) |
dbp:citations |
[1990] 1 SCR 30 (en) |
dbp:concurrence |
Lamer J (en) |
dbp:decidedDate |
1990-01-25 (xsd:date) |
dbp:fullCaseName |
Mario Duarte v Her Majesty The Queen (en) |
dbp:heardDate |
0001-10-04 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
dbp:history |
appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario (en) |
dbp:joinmajority |
Dickson CJ and L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and McLachlin JJ (en) |
dbp:majority |
La Forest J (en) |
dbp:ruling |
Duarte appeal dismissed (en) |
dbp:scc |
1989 (xsd:integer) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc2 |
dct:subject |
dbc:1990_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Section_Eight_Charter_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases |
gold:hypernym |
dbr:Case |
rdf:type |
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
rdfs:comment |
R v Duarte, [1990] 1 SCR 30 is a leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to privacy under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Court held that a warrantless and surreptitious video recording of private communications violated section 8. Consent of only one party to a conversation is insufficient to be reasonable. (en) 女皇訴杜阿爾特案(英語:R v Duarte,[1990] 1 SCR 30)是加拿大最高法院根據《加拿大權利與自由憲章》第8條就私隱權作出決定的主要案件。法院認為,無手令且秘密錄製私人通訊的影片違反了第8條。對話中只有一方的同意不足以成為合理的。 (zh) |
rdfs:label |
R v Duarte (en) 女皇訴杜阿爾特案 (zh) |
owl:sameAs |
freebase:R v Duarte wikidata:R v Duarte dbpedia-zh:R v Duarte https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4ttt9 |
prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:R_v_Duarte?oldid=955299873&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:R_v_Duarte |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:R._v._Duarte |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:R_v_Tse dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Dickson_Court) dbr:R._v._Duarte |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:R_v_Duarte |