Stockman v. Trump (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

Stockman v. Trump (5:17-cv-01799-JGB-KKx) is an old lawsuit filed on September 5, 2017, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The suit, like the similar prior suits Jane Doe v. Trump, Stone v. Trump, and Karnoski v. Trump, seeks to block Trump and top Pentagon officials from implementing the proposed ban on military service for transgender people under the auspices of the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fifth Amendment. The suit was filed on the behalf of four named and three anonymous transgender plaintiffs by Equality California (EQCA). Two other major LGBT-rights organizations which had filed Jane Doe v. Trump, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, joined the suit as co-counsels in Octob

thumbnail

Property Value
dbo:abstract Stockman v. Trump (5:17-cv-01799-JGB-KKx) is an old lawsuit filed on September 5, 2017, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The suit, like the similar prior suits Jane Doe v. Trump, Stone v. Trump, and Karnoski v. Trump, seeks to block Trump and top Pentagon officials from implementing the proposed ban on military service for transgender people under the auspices of the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fifth Amendment. The suit was filed on the behalf of four named and three anonymous transgender plaintiffs by Equality California (EQCA). Two other major LGBT-rights organizations which had filed Jane Doe v. Trump, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, joined the suit as co-counsels in October 2017. In addition to President Trump, the amended suit names as defendants the Secretaries of Defense (James Mattis), the Army (Ryan McCarthy, acting), the Navy (Richard Spencer), the Air Force (Heather Wilson), and Homeland Security (Elaine Duke). (en)
dbo:thumbnail wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/California-central.png?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink https://www.glad.org/cases/stockman-v-trump/ http://files.eqcf.org/cases/217-cv-06516-1/ http://www.nclrights.org/cases-and-policy/cases-and-advocacy/case-doe-v-trump/ https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3964535-Trump-Transgender-Military-Memo.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190618162239/http:/www.nclrights.org/cases-and-policy/cases-and-advocacy/case-doe-v-trump/
dbo:wikiPageID 55686210 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 28853 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1116549353 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Amicus_curiae dbc:Donald_Trump_litigation dbr:Presidential_Memorandum_on_Military_Service_by_Transgender_Individuals_(2017) dbr:Presidential_Memorandum_on_Military_Service_by_Transgender_Individuals_(2018) dbc:History_of_LGBT_civil_rights_in_the_United_States dbr:Joseph_Dunford dbr:List_of_lawsuits_involving_Donald_Trump dbr:Richard_V._Spencer dbr:United_States_Air_Force dbr:United_States_Army dbr:United_States_Department_of_Defense dbr:United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security dbr:United_States_Department_of_Justice_Civil_Division dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California dbr:United_States_Navy dbc:Transgender_people_and_the_United_States_military dbc:2018_in_LGBT_history dbc:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California_cases dbr:Ryan_McCarthy_(U.S._Army) dbr:Elaine_Duke dbr:GLBTQ_Legal_Advocates_&_Defenders dbr:The_Trevor_Project dbr:Equality_California dbr:Obama_administration dbc:United_States_transgender_rights_case_law dbr:Transgender_personnel_in_the_United_States_military dbr:Due_process_clause dbr:Heather_Wilson dbc:2017_in_LGBT_history dbr:Jesus_Bernal dbr:Karnoski_v._Trump dbr:Kenly_Kiya_Kato dbr:Transgender_American_Veterans_Association dbr:Donald_Trump dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:National_Center_for_Lesbian_Rights dbr:National_Center_for_Transgender_Equality dbr:James_Mattis dbr:Jane_Doe_v._Trump dbr:Stone_v._Trump
dbp:author Judge Jesus Bernal (en)
dbp:citations 5 (xsd:integer) (en)
dbp:court dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California (en)
dbp:dateDecided Pending (en)
dbp:defendant dbr:Joseph_Dunford dbr:Richard_V._Spencer dbr:Ryan_McCarthy_(U.S._Army) dbr:Elaine_Duke dbr:Heather_Wilson dbr:Donald_Trump dbr:James_Mattis (en)
dbp:judge dbr:Jesus_Bernal dbr:Kenly_Kiya_Kato
dbp:name Stockman, et al v. Trump, et al (en)
dbp:plaintiff dbr:Equality_California Jane Doe (en) John Doe 1 (en) John Doe 2 (en) Aiden Stockman (en) Jaquice Tate (en) Nicolas Talbott (en) Tamasyn Reeves (en)
dbp:source Order , Case 5:17-cv-01799-JGB-KK, Dkt. No. 79 (en)
dbp:text Plaintiffs are "protected by the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause[, which] contains within it the prohibition against denying to any person the equal protection of the laws." [{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Windsor vol=570 reporter=U.S. opinion=___ pinpoint= court= date=2013}}] Consequently, the government must proffer a justification which is "exceedingly persuasive," "genuine," "not hypothesized," not "invented post hoc in response to litigation," and "must not rely on overbroad generalizations." [{{cite court litigants=United States v. Virginia vol=518 reporter=U.S. opinion=515 pinpoint=531 court= date=1996}}] Defendants' justifications do not pass muster. Their reliance on cost is unavailing, as precedent shows the ease of cost and administration not survive intermediate scrutiny even if it is significant. [{{cite court litigants=Frontiero v. Richardson vol=411 reporter=U.S. opinion=677 pinpoint=688–91 court= date=1996}}] Moreover, all the evidence in the record suggests the ban's cost savings to the government is minuscule. Furthermore, Defendants' unsupported allegation that allowing transgender individuals to be in the military would adversely affect unit cohesion is similarly unsupported by the proffered evidence. These justifications fall far short of exceedingly persuasive. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Cite_web dbt:Queer_people_and_military_service_in_the_United_States dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Infobox_United_States_District_Court_case
dct:subject dbc:Donald_Trump_litigation dbc:History_of_LGBT_civil_rights_in_the_United_States dbc:Transgender_people_and_the_United_States_military dbc:2018_in_LGBT_history dbc:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California_cases dbc:United_States_transgender_rights_case_law dbc:2017_in_LGBT_history
rdfs:comment Stockman v. Trump (5:17-cv-01799-JGB-KKx) is an old lawsuit filed on September 5, 2017, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The suit, like the similar prior suits Jane Doe v. Trump, Stone v. Trump, and Karnoski v. Trump, seeks to block Trump and top Pentagon officials from implementing the proposed ban on military service for transgender people under the auspices of the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fifth Amendment. The suit was filed on the behalf of four named and three anonymous transgender plaintiffs by Equality California (EQCA). Two other major LGBT-rights organizations which had filed Jane Doe v. Trump, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, joined the suit as co-counsels in Octob (en)
rdfs:label Stockman v. Trump (en)
owl:sameAs wikidata:Stockman v. Trump https://global.dbpedia.org/id/3yaam
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Stockman_v._Trump?oldid=1116549353&ns=0
foaf:depiction wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/California-central.png
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Stockman_v._Trump
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Presidential_Memorandum_on_Military_Service_by_Transgender_Individuals_(2018) dbr:List_of_lawsuits_involving_Donald_Trump dbr:Department_of_Defense_Instruction_1300.28 dbr:Transgender_personnel_in_the_United_States_military dbr:Transgender_rights_in_the_United_States dbr:Karnoski_v._Trump dbr:Doe_v._Trump_(2017) dbr:Stone_v._Trump
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Stockman_v._Trump