Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (original) (raw)

dbo:abstract

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 (2002), is one of the United States Supreme Court's more recent interpretations of the Takings Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.The case dealt with the question of whether a moratorium on construction of individual homes imposed by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency fell under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution and whether the landowners therefore should receive just compensation as required by that clause. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency was represented by future Chief Justice John Roberts.Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court, finding that the moratorium did not constitute a taking. It reasoned that there was an inherent difference between the acquisition of property for public use and the regulation of property from private use. The majority concluded that the moratorium at issue in this case should be classified as a regulation of property from private use and therefore no compensation was required. (en)

dbo:wikiPageExternalLink

dbo:wikiPageID

4500699 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageLength

9132 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

1068423206 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageWikiLink

dbp:arguedate

0001-01-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:argueyear

2002 (xsd:integer)

dbp:case

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, (en)

dbp:cornell

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-1167.ZS.html

dbp:decidedate

0001-04-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:decideyear

2002 (xsd:integer)

dbp:dissent

Thomas (en)
Rehnquist (en)

dbp:findlaw

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/535/302.html

dbp:fullname

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Incorporated, et al. v. Tahoe-Regional Planning Agency, et al. (en)

dbp:holding

The moratorium did not constitute a taking. There was an inherent difference between the acquisition of property for public use and the regulation of property from private use. The moratorium at issue in this case should be classified as a regulation of property from private use and therefore no compensation is required. (en)

dbp:italicTitle

force (en)

dbp:joindissent

Scalia (en)
Scalia, Thomas (en)

dbp:joinmajority

O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)

dbp:justia

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/535/302/

dbp:lawsapplied

dbp:litigants

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (en)

dbp:loc

http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep535/usrep535302/usrep535302.pdf

dbp:majority

Stevens (en)

dbp:oyez

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-1167

dbp:parallelcitations

172800.0 (dbd:second)

dbp:prior

25920.0 (dbd:second)

dbp:uspage

302 (xsd:integer)

dbp:usvol

535 (xsd:integer)

dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate

dct:subject

rdf:type

rdfs:comment

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 535 U.S. 302 (2002), is one of the United States Supreme Court's more recent interpretations of the Takings Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.The case dealt with the question of whether a moratorium on construction of individual homes imposed by the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency fell under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution and whether the landowners therefore should receive just compensation as required by that clause. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency was represented by future Chief Justice John Roberts.Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court, finding that the moratorium did not constitute a taking. It reasoned that there was an inherent difference between the acqui (en)

rdfs:label

Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (en)

owl:sameAs

prov:wasDerivedFrom

wikipedia-en:Tahoe-Sierra_Preservation_Council,_Inc...Planning_Agency?oldid=1068423206&ns=0

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

wikipedia-en:Tahoe-Sierra_Preservation_Council,_Inc._v._Tahoe_Regional_Planning_Agency

foaf:name

(en)
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Incorporated, et al. v. Tahoe-Regional Planning Agency, et al. (en)

is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of

is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of

is foaf:primaryTopic of

wikipedia-en:Tahoe-Sierra_Preservation_Council,_Inc._v._Tahoe_Regional_Planning_Agency