United States v. Adams (original) (raw)
- United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (1966), is a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of patent law. This case was later cited in KSR v. Teleflex as an example of a case satisfying the requirement for non-obviousness of a combination of known elements. It also features one of the great stories of patent litigation lore, with Adams's attorney utilizing an innovative and unique method of non-oral advocacy at oral argument in front of the Supreme Court. (en)
- https://supreme.justia.com/us/383/39/case.html
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/1965/55
- http://www.google.com/patents/about%3Fid=86NWAAAAEBAJ&dq=2322210
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8951491662881488667
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/107161/united-states-v-adams/
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep383/usrep383039/usrep383039.pdf
- 23218225 (xsd:integer)
- 6940 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1068899280 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:Electromotive_force
- dbr:United_States_Army_Signal_Corps
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Claims
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:Bloomberg_BNA
- dbr:Silver_chloride
- dbr:Patent
- dbc:1966_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Alessandro_Volta
- dbc:United_States_patent_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court
- dbr:KSR_v._Teleflex
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Non-obviousness_in_United_States_patent_law
- dbr:Graham_v._John_Deere
- dbr:Wet_batteries
- dbr:Wet_battery
- dbr:Cuprous_chloride
- dbr:U.S.P.Q.
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- dbr:Moist_paste_electrolyte
- dbr:Trial_Commissioner
- 0001-10-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1965 (xsd:integer)
- United States v. Adams, (en)
- 0001-02-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1966 (xsd:integer)
- White (en)
- United States v. Bert N. Adams, et al. (en)
- Wet battery including a combination of known elements not obvious because the operating characteristics were unexpected and improved over then-existing wet batteries. (en)
- Warren, Black, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart (en)
- United States v. Adams (en)
- Clark (en)
- Fortas (en)
- 172800.0
- 39 (xsd:integer)
- 383 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:1966_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_patent_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (1966), is a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of patent law. This case was later cited in KSR v. Teleflex as an example of a case satisfying the requirement for non-obviousness of a combination of known elements. It also features one of the great stories of patent litigation lore, with Adams's attorney utilizing an innovative and unique method of non-oral advocacy at oral argument in front of the Supreme Court. (en)
- United States v. Adams (en)
- freebase:United States v. Adams
- yago-res:United States v. Adams
- wikidata:United States v. Adams
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4wgRc
- (en)
- United States v. Bert N. Adams, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_patent_case_law
- dbr:List_of_United_States_patent_law_cases
- dbr:List_of_patent_case_law
- dbr:Graham_v._John_Deere_Co.
- dbr:383_U.S._39
- dbr:United_States_v_Adams
is foaf:primaryTopic of