Watson v British Boxing Board of Control (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134 was a case of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales that established an exception to the defence of consent to trespass to the person and an extension of the duty of care expected in cases of . Michael Watson was injured in a boxing match supervised by the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBofC or BBBC), which was expected to provide medical care. This care was insufficient, and as such Watson was in a coma for 40 days, and spent 6 years in a wheelchair. After recovering consciousness, he sued the BBBC in negligence, and was awarded approximately £1 million by the High Court of Justice, who determined that the relationship between the BBBC and Watson was sufficient to create a duty of care. This decision was upheld by the Court of

Property Value
dbo:abstract Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134 was a case of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales that established an exception to the defence of consent to trespass to the person and an extension of the duty of care expected in cases of . Michael Watson was injured in a boxing match supervised by the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBofC or BBBC), which was expected to provide medical care. This care was insufficient, and as such Watson was in a coma for 40 days, and spent 6 years in a wheelchair. After recovering consciousness, he sued the BBBC in negligence, and was awarded approximately £1 million by the High Court of Justice, who determined that the relationship between the BBBC and Watson was sufficient to create a duty of care. This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, who noted that the BBBC had a duty not only to ensure that injuries did not occur, but that injuries were properly treated. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2000/2116.html
dbo:wikiPageID 26789377 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 7156 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1049029766 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Anthony_May_(judge) dbr:Chris_Eubank dbc:Boxing_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:English_trespass_case_law dbr:BAILII dbr:Trespass_in_English_law dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbr:British_Boxing_Board_of_Control dbr:Oxford_University_Press dbc:2000_in_boxing dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbc:2000_in_British_law dbr:Volenti_non_fit_injuria dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:2000_in_case_law dbr:John_Laws_(judge) dbr:Michael_Watson dbr:Case_citation dbr:Nicholas_Phillips,_Baron_Phillips_of_Worth_Matravers dbr:Ian_Kennedy_(judge) dbr:Negligence_in_English_law
dbp:citations [2001] QB 1134, [2000] EWCA Civ 2116 (en)
dbp:court dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
dbp:dateDecided 2000-12-19 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullName Michael Alexander Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd & World Boxing Organisation Inc (en)
dbp:judges dbr:Nicholas_Phillips,_Baron_Phillips_of_Worth_Matravers Laws LJ (en) May LJ (en)
dbp:keywords trespass to the person, duty of care, negligence (en)
dbp:name Watson v British Boxing Board of Control (en)
dbp:opinions dbr:Nicholas_Phillips,_Baron_Phillips_of_Worth_Matravers
dbp:priorActions dbr:High_Court_of_Justice
dbp:transcripts transcript at BAILII (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case
dct:subject dbc:Boxing_in_the_United_Kingdom dbc:English_trespass_case_law dbc:2000_in_boxing dbc:2000_in_British_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:2000_in_case_law
gold:hypernym dbr:Case
rdf:type yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatEnglishTrespassCases
rdfs:comment Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134 was a case of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales that established an exception to the defence of consent to trespass to the person and an extension of the duty of care expected in cases of . Michael Watson was injured in a boxing match supervised by the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBofC or BBBC), which was expected to provide medical care. This care was insufficient, and as such Watson was in a coma for 40 days, and spent 6 years in a wheelchair. After recovering consciousness, he sued the BBBC in negligence, and was awarded approximately £1 million by the High Court of Justice, who determined that the relationship between the BBBC and Watson was sufficient to create a duty of care. This decision was upheld by the Court of (en)
rdfs:label Watson v British Boxing Board of Control (en)
owl:sameAs freebase:Watson v British Boxing Board of Control wikidata:Watson v British Boxing Board of Control https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4xqgY
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Watson_v_British_Boxing_Board_of_Control?oldid=1049029766&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Watson_v_British_Boxing_Board_of_Control
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Trespass_in_English_law dbr:Michael_Watson
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Watson_v_British_Boxing_Board_of_Control