Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (original) (raw)
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers. The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the vouchers could be used for private religious schools. (en)
- http://www.religionandsocialpolicy.org/legal/legal_update_display.cfm%3Fid=10
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/536/639.html
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=127516650659374253
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/121168/zelman-v-simmons-harris/
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-1751
- http://supreme.justia.com/us/536/639/case.html
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep536/usrep536639/usrep536639.pdf
- http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/6th/00a0411p.html
- 1680639 (xsd:integer)
- 21997 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1114481203 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_536
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_lawsuits
- dbr:Establishment_Clause
- dbr:Cleveland
- dbr:Cleveland_School_District
- dbr:Frederick_Douglass
- dbr:Freedom_of_religion
- dbr:Mueller_v._Allen
- dbr:Concurring_opinion
- dbc:Education_in_Cleveland
- dbr:Lemon_v._Kurtzman
- dbr:Brown_v._Board_of_Education
- dbc:2002_in_religion
- dbr:Dissenting_opinion
- dbr:6th_Cir.
- dbr:Everson_v._Board_of_Education
- dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbc:2002_in_education
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbc:2002_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:Establishment_Clause_case_law
- dbc:United_States_education_case_law
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Ohio
- dbr:Ohio_Department_of_Education
- dbr:Lottery
- dbr:Majority_opinion
- dbr:School_vouchers
- dbr:Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
- dbr:Blaine_Amendments
- dbr:F.3d
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- 0001-02-20 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2002 (xsd:integer)
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, (en)
- Thomas (en)
- O'Connor (en)
- 0001-06-27 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2002 (xsd:integer)
- Souter (en)
- Stevens (en)
- Breyer (en)
- 0 (xsd:integer)
- Susan Tave Zelman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Doris Simmons-Harris, et al. (en)
- The Ohio school voucher program does not violate the Establishment Clause even if the vouchers could be used for private, religious schools, because it passed a five-part test developed by the court in the case. (en)
- Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
- Stevens, Souter (en)
- O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas (en)
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (en)
- Rehnquist (en)
- 172800.0 (dbd:second)
- 25920.0 (dbd:second)
- 639 (xsd:integer)
- 536 (xsd:integer)
- dbt:Caselaw_source
- dbt:Citation_needed
- dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
- dbt:Multiple_issues
- dbt:Note
- dbt:One_source
- dbt:Primary_sources
- dbt:Reflist
- dbt:Wikisource-inline
- dbt:Tone
- dbt:Ussc
- dbt:US1stAmendment
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_lawsuits
- dbc:Education_in_Cleveland
- dbc:2002_in_religion
- dbc:2002_in_education
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbc:2002_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:Establishment_Clause_case_law
- dbc:United_States_education_case_law
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesLawsuits
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Act100030358
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:DueProcess101181475
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:GroupAction101080366
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:Lawsuit101182654
- yago:Proceeding101184814
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- umbel-rc:Event
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers. The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, even if the vouchers could be used for private religious schools. (en)
- Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (en)
- freebase:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
- yago-res:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
- wikidata:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
- dbpedia-he:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4x7vV
- (en)
- Susan Tave Zelman,Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Doris Simmons-Harris, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
- dbr:Cleveland_Voucher_case
- dbr:536_U.S._639
- dbr:Zelamn_v._Simmons-Harris
- dbr:Zelman_v_Simmons-Harris
- dbr:Zelman_v_simmons-harris
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Carson_v._Makin
- dbr:Privatization_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment
- dbr:Alliance_for_School_Choice
- dbr:Judith_L._French
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Establishment_Clause
- dbr:Clint_Bolick
- dbr:Mueller_v._Allen
- dbr:Nancy_Spence
- dbr:Lee_v._Weisman
- dbr:Manhattan_Institute_for_Policy_Research
- dbr:Cleveland_Voucher_case
- dbr:William_Rehnquist
- dbr:536_U.S._639
- dbr:EdChoice
- dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Education_policy_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Accommodationism_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Jay_P._Greene
- dbr:Zelman
- dbr:Zelman_(surname)
- dbr:Zelamn_v._Simmons-Harris
- dbr:Zelman_v_Simmons-Harris
- dbr:Institute_for_Justice
- dbr:School_voucher
- dbr:School_choice
- dbr:Zelman_v_simmons-harris
is foaf:primaryTopic of