Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) also perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion (original) (raw)

Abstract

Although pigeons have been shown to be susceptible to several size and length illusions, other avian species have not been tested intensively for illusory perception. Here we report how bantams perceive the Zöllner figure, in which parallel lines look nonparallel due to short crosshatches superimposed on the lines. Watanabe et al. (Cognition 119:137–141, 2011) showed that pigeons, like humans, perceived parallel lines as nonparallel but that the orientation of subjective convergence was opposite to that of humans. We trained three bantams to peck at the narrower (or wider) of the two gaps at the end of a pair of nonparallel lines. After adapting them to target lines with randomly oriented crosshatches (which result in no apparent illusion to humans), we tested the bantams’ responses on randomly inserted probe trials, in which crosshatches that should induce the standard Zöllner-like illusion for humans replaced the randomly oriented ones. The results suggested bantams, like pigeons, perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• Barbet I, Fagot J (2002) Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio). Behav Brain Res 132:11–115
  Article Google Scholar
• Benhar E, Samuel D (1982) Visual illusions in the baboon (Papio anibis). Anim Learn Behav 10:115–118
  Article Google Scholar
• Cavoto KK, Cook RG (2001) Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Behav Proc 27:3–16
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Deruelle C, Fagot J (1997) Hemispheric lateralisation and global precedence effects in the processing of visual stimuli by humans and baboons (Papio papio). Laterality: asymmetries of body. Brain Cogn 2:233–246
  CAS Google Scholar
• Deruelle C, Fagot J (1998) Visual search for global/local stimulus features in humans and baboons. Psychonomic Bull Rev 5:476–481
  Article Google Scholar
• DiPietro NT, Wasserman A, Young ME (2002) Effects of occlusion on pigeons’ visual object recognition. Perception 31:1299–1312
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Doherty MJ, Campbell NM, Tsuji H, Phillips WA (2009) The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children. Develop Science 13:714–721
  Article Google Scholar
• Dominguez KE (1954) A study of visual illusions in the monkey. J Genetic Psychol 85:105–127
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fellows BJ (1967) Reversal of the Mu¨ller–Lyer illusion with changes in the length of the inter-fins line. Quarterly J Exp Psychol 19:208–214
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Forkman B (1998) Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two dimensional picture. Perception 27:861–867
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Fujita K (2004) How do nonhuman animals perceptually integrate figural fragments? Jap Psychol Res 46:154–169
  Article Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Ushitani T (2006) How do primates and birds recognize figures? In: Fujita K, Itakura S (eds) Diversity of cognition: evolution, development, domestication, and pathology. Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, pp 38–54
  Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Blough DS, Blough PM (1991) Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion. Anim Learn Behav 19:283–293
  Article Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Blough DS, Blough PM (1993) Effects of the inclination of context lines on perception of the Ponzo illusion by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 21:29–34
  Article Google Scholar
• Girgus JS, Coren S (1982) Assimilation and contrast illusions: differences in plasticity. Percep Psychophys 32:555–561
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Goto T, Uchiyama I, Imai A, Takahashi S, Hanari T, Nakamura S, Kobari H (2007) Assimilation and contrast in optic illusions. Jap Psychol Res 49:33–44
  Article Google Scholar
• Kitaoka A, Ishihara M (2000) Three elemental illusions determine the Zöllner illusion. Percep Psychophys 62:569–575
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA, Biederman I (2007) Pigeons’ recognition of partially occluded objects depends on specific training experience. Perception 36:33–48
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lea SEG, Slater AM, Ryan CME (1996) Perception of object unity in chicks: a comparison with the human infant. Infant Behav Develop 19:501–504
  Article Google Scholar
• Nagasaka Y, Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA (2007) Prior experience affects amodal completion in pigeons. Percept Psychophys 69:596–605
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Fujita K, Ushitani T, Miyata H (2006) Perception of the standard and the reversed Muller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 120:252–261
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Fujita K (2008) Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus–Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 34:375–387
  Article Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Betsuyaku T, Fujita K (2010) Do bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) experience amodal completion? An analysis of visual search performance. J Comp Psychol 124:331–335
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Betsuyaku T, Fujita K (2011a) Do bantams amodally complete partly occluded lines? An analysis of line classification performance. J Comp Psychol 125:411–419
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Betsuyaku T, Fujita K (2011b) Do birds (pigeons and bantams) know how confident they are of their perceptual decisions? Anim Cogn 14:83–93
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9:353–383
  Article Google Scholar
• Navon D (1981) The forest revisited: more on global precedence. Psychol Res 43:1–32
  Article Google Scholar
• Oyama T (1975) Determinants of the Zöllner illusion. Psychol Res 37:261–280
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Parron C, Fagot J (2007) Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with the Ebbinghaus illusion. J Comp Psychol 121:405–411
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pressey AW (1967) A theory of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Percep Mot Skills 25:569–572
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percep Psychophys 57:971–976
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Révész G (1924) Experiments on animal space perception. British J Psychol 14:388–414
  Google Scholar
• Robinson JO (1972) The psychology of visual illusions. Dover, New York
• Robinson JO (1998) The psychology of visual illusions. Dover, New York
• Rock I (1984) Perception. Scientific American Books 158, New York
  Google Scholar
• Rock I (1986) 6 Illusions. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbooks of perception and human performance. Wiley, New York, p 33
  Google Scholar
• Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE, Monroe Jr, Burt L (1988) A classification of the living birds of the world based on DNA–DNA hybridization studies. Auk 105:409–423
  Google Scholar
• Watanabe M, Nikaido M, Tsuda TT, Kobayashi T, Mindell D, Cao Y, Okada N, Hasegawa M (2006) New candidate species most closely related to penguins. Gene 378:65–73
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Watanabe S, Nakamura N, Fujita K (2011) Pigeons perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion. Cognition 119:137–141
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Winslow CN (1933) Visual illusions in the chick. Arch Psychol 153:80
  Google Scholar
• Yamazaki Y, Otsuka Y, Kanazawa S, Yamaguchi MK (2010) Perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in 5- to 8-month-old infants. Jpn Psychol Res 52:33–40
  Article Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa N (1939) An experimental study on a modified Müller-Lyer figure (1). Jap J Psychol 14:321–326
  Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sota Watanabe, Noriyuki Nakamura, and Kazuo Fujita are grateful to Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan. This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellows 20096245 to Sota Watanabe and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 20220004 to KF, and by the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Global COE Program, D-07, to Kyoto University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sota Watanabe, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. E-mail: sota.m.watanabe@gmail.com. This experiment was approved by the Committee for Animal Experiments, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University. We wish to thank James R. Anderson for his careful editing of an earlier version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
   Sota Watanabe, Noriyuki Nakamura & Kazuo Fujita

Authors

1. Sota Watanabe
2. Noriyuki Nakamura
3. Kazuo Fujita

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSota Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, S., Nakamura, N. & Fujita, K. Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) also perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion.Anim Cogn 16, 109–115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0556-0

Download citation

• Received: 13 January 2012
• Revised: 21 August 2012
• Accepted: 21 August 2012
• Published: 09 September 2012
• Issue date: January 2013
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0556-0

Keywords