Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in the elderly: influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on late survival and left ventricular mass regression (original) (raw)

References

1. Sundt TM, Bailey MS, Moon MR, Mendeloff EN, Huddleston CB, Pasque MK, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation 2000;102(suppl III):70–74.
   Google Scholar
2. Carrier M, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, Hebert Y, Page P, Cartier R, et al. Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S249–S252.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
3. Freed DH, Tam JW, Moon MC, Harding GEJ, Ahmad E, Pascoe EA. Nineteen-millimeter prosthetic aortic valves allow normalization of left ventricular mass in elderly women. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:2022–2025.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
4. Vitale N, Clark SC, Ramsden A, Hasan A, Hilton CJ, Holden MP. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of small perimount aortic valves in patients aged 75 years or older. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:35–40.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
5. Melby SJ, Zierer A, Kaiser SP, Guthrie TJ, Keune JD, Schuessler RB, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: risk factors for early and late mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1651–1657.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
6. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20–24.
   PubMed CAS Google Scholar
7. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131–1141.
   Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
8. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(suppl 1):114–120.
   PubMed Google Scholar
9. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, Dalla Tomba M, Mhagna Z, Troise G, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:505–510.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
10. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108: 983–988.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
11. Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Bedard P, Hendy PJ, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:149–159.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
12. Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, Centurini PB, Sabatini T, Amaducci A, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006;113:570–576.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
13. Moon MR, Pasque MK, Munfakh NA, Melby SJ, Lawton JS, Moazami N, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:481–489.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
14. Mohty-Echahidi D, Malouf JF, Girard SE, Schaff HV, Grill DE, Enriquez-Sarano ME, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006;113:420–426.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
15. Izzat MB, Kadir I, Reeves B, Wilde P, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68: 1657–1660.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
16. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, Joyner CD, Fremes SE, Morgan CD, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1822–1829.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
17. Kato Y, Suehiro S, Shibata T, Sasaki Y, Hirai H. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Card Surg 2007;22:314–319.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
18. Amarelli C, Della Corte A, Romano G, Iasevoli G, Dialetto G, De Santo LS, et al. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:512–517.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
19. Roscitano A, Benedetto U, Sciangula A, Merico E, Barberi F, Bianchini R, et al. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29: 139–143.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
20. Howell NJ, Keogh BE, Barnet V, Bonser RS, Graham TR, Rooney SJ, et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:10–14.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
21. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:708–711.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
22. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450–458.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
23. Okin PM, Devereux RB, Nieminen MS, Jern S, Oikarinen L, Viitasalo M, et al. Relationship of the electrocardiographic strain pattern to left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients: the LIFE study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:514–520.
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
24. Ross J Jr, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968; 38(suppl):V61–V67.
    Google Scholar

Download references