Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a distance’ (original) (raw)

Nature volume 454, pages 861–864 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Correlations are generally described by one of two mechanisms: either a first event influences a second one by sending information encoded in bosons or other physical carriers, or the correlated events have some common causes in their shared history. Quantum physics predicts an entirely different kind of cause for some correlations, named entanglement. This reveals itself in correlations that violate Bell inequalities (implying that they cannot be described by common causes) between space-like separated events (implying that they cannot be described by classical communication). Many Bell tests have been performed1, and loopholes related to locality2,3,4 and detection5,6 have been closed in several independent experiments. It is still possible that a first event could influence a second, but the speed of this hypothetical influence (Einstein’s ‘spooky action at a distance’) would need to be defined in some universal privileged reference frame and be greater than the speed of light. Here we put stringent experimental bounds on the speed of all such hypothetical influences. We performed a Bell test over more than 24 hours between two villages separated by 18 km and approximately east–west oriented, with the source located precisely in the middle. We continuously observed two-photon interferences well above the Bell inequality threshold. Taking advantage of the Earth’s rotation, the configuration of our experiment allowed us to determine, for any hypothetically privileged frame, a lower bound for the speed of the influence. For example, if such a privileged reference frame exists and is such that the Earth’s speed in this frame is less than 10-3 times that of the speed of light, then the speed of the influence would have to exceed that of light by at least four orders of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aspect, A. Bell’s inequality test: more ideal than ever. Nature 398, 189–190 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Aspect, A. et al. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1982)
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  3. Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H. & Gisin, N. Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563–3566 (1998)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039–5043 (1998)
    Article ADS MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
  5. Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Matsukevich, D. N. et al. Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 150404 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Eberhard Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality (ed. Schommers, W.) 169–216 (Springer, Berlin, 1989)
    Book Google Scholar
  8. Scarani, V. et al. The speed of quantum information and the preferred frame: analysis of experimental data. Phys. Lett. A 276, 1–7 (2000)
    Article ADS MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
  9. Feinberg, G. Possibility of faster-than-light particles. Phys. Rev. 159, 1089–1105 (1967)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Bohm, D. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 (1952)
    Article ADS MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
  11. Bohm, D. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “hidden” variables II. Phys. Rev. 85, 180–193 (1952)
    Article ADS MathSciNet CAS Google Scholar
  12. Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. The Undivided Universe 293 (Routledge, London, 1993)
    MATH Google Scholar
  13. Gisin, N., Scarini, V., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Optical tests of quantum nonlocality: from EPR-Bell tests towards experiments with moving observers. Annal. Phys. 9, 831–841 (2000)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  14. Zbinden, H. et al. Experimental test of nonlocal quantum correlation in relativistic configurations. Phys. Rev. A 63, 022111 (2001)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Garisto, R. What is the speed of quantum information? Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0212078〉 (2002)
  16. Franson, J. D. Bell inequality for position and time. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205–2208 (1989)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Tanzilli, S. et al. PPLN waveguide for quantum communication. Eur. Phys. J. D 18, 155–160 (2002)
    ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Thew, R. et al. Experimental investigation of the robustness of partially entangled qubits over 11 km. Phys. Rev. A 66, 062304 (2002)
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  19. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Scholder, F., Gautier, J.-D., Wegmüller, M. & Gisin, N. Long-distance OTDR using photon counting and large detection gates at telecom wavelength. Opt. Commun. 213, 57–61 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  21. Passy, R. et al. Experimental and theoretical investigations of coherent OFDR with semiconductor laser sources. J. Lightwave Technol. 12, 1622–1630 (1994)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  22. Brendel, J., Gisin, N. & Zbinden, H. in Proc. 5th Opt. Fiber Measurement Conf. (eds Boisrobert, Ch. & Tanguy, E.) 12–17 (Université de Nantes, Nantes, 1999)
    Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge technical support by J.-D. Gautier and C. Barreiro. The access to the telecommunications network was provided by Swisscom. This work was supported by the Swiss NCCR Quantum Photonics and the European Union project QAP. The image of the Earth in Fig. 1 is a NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Image by R. Stöckli.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, 20 Rue de l’Ecole de Médecine, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland ,
    Daniel Salart, Augustin Baas, Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Gisin & Hugo Zbinden

Authors

  1. Daniel Salart
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Augustin Baas
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Cyril Branciard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Nicolas Gisin
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Hugo Zbinden
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toDaniel Salart.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-3 with Legends and Supplementary Discussion on the details of the experimental setup, the phase scan, the visibility fitting method and the process followed to find an expression for |β||(t)|. and upper bounds for |β||(t)|. (PDF 374 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salart, D., Baas, A., Branciard, C. et al. Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a distance’.Nature 454, 861–864 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07121

Download citation

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Editorial Summary

Spooky action: setting a speed limit

Einstein called entanglement, a type of correlation found only in quantum physics, 'spooky action at a distance'. Experimental tests known as Bell inequalities have all but ruled out a classical explanation for such correlations, but the possibility remains that a first event could influence a second one, if the influence occurs faster than the speed of light. An impressive new experiment has been performed with a view to establishing a lower limit for the speed of such hypothetical influences. The experiment involved a Bell inequality test lasting more than 24 hours between two Swiss villages 18 km apart and approximately east–west oriented, with the source located precisely in the middle. Taking advantage of the Earth's rotation, the experiment allowed the determination of a lower bound for the speed of any such influence. The conclusion was that the minimal speed of hypothetical spooky action at a distance, under plausible assumptions for this experiment, is at least 10,000 times greater than the speed of light. The existence in nature of a real spooky action at a distance is therefore deemed implausible.

Associated content