Rise and fall of political complexity in island South-East Asia and the Pacific (original) (raw)

Nature volume 467, pages 801–804 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

There is disagreement about whether human political evolution has proceeded through a sequence of incremental increases in complexity, or whether larger, non-sequential increases have occurred. The extent to which societies have decreased in complexity is also unclear. These debates have continued largely in the absence of rigorous, quantitative tests. We evaluated six competing models of political evolution in Austronesian-speaking societies using phylogenetic methods. Here we show that in the best-fitting model political complexity rises and falls in a sequence of small steps. This is closely followed by another model in which increases are sequential but decreases can be either sequential or in bigger drops. The results indicate that large, non-sequential jumps in political complexity have not occurred during the evolutionary history of these societies. This suggests that, despite the numerous contingent pathways of human history, there are regularities in cultural evolution that can be detected using computational phylogenetic methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diamond, J. Guns, Germs and Steel (Vintage, 1997)
    Google Scholar
  2. Johnson, A. W. & Earle, T. The Evolution of Human Societies (Stanford Univ. Press, 2000)
    Google Scholar
  3. Service, E. R. Primitive Social Organization (Random House, 1962)
    Google Scholar
  4. Flannery, K. V. The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3, 399–426 (1972)
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Carneiro, R. L. Evolutionism in Cultural Anthropology (Westview, 2003)
    Google Scholar
  6. Spencer, C. S. On the tempo and mode of state formation—neoevolutionism reconsidered. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 9, 1–30 (1990)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Keech McIntosh, S. in Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to Complexity in Africa (ed. Keech McIntosh, S.) 1–30 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999)
    Book Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, R. B. Toward a networks and boundaries approach to early complex polities: the Late Shang case. Curr. Anthropol. 50, 821–848 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Bondarenko, D. M., Grinin, L. E. & Korotayev, A. V. Alternative pathways of social evolution. Social Evol. Hist. 1, 54–79 (2002)
    Google Scholar
  10. Yoffee, N. in Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? (eds Yoffee, N. & Sherratt, A.) 60–78 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993)
    Book Google Scholar
  11. Yoffee, N. Myths of the Archaic State: Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005)
    Book Google Scholar
  12. Tainter, J. A. Archaeology of overshoot and collapse. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35, 59–74 (2006)
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Marcus, J. The archaeological evidence for social evolution. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 37, 251–266 (2008)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Kirch, P. V. & Green, R. C. Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia: An Essay in Historical Anthropology. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001)
    Book Google Scholar
  15. Jordan, F. M., Gray, R. D., Greenhill, S. J. & Mace, R. Matrilocal residence is ancestral in Austronesian societies. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1957–1964 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Hage, P. Reconstructing ancestral Oceanic society. Asian Perspect. 38, 200–227 (1999)
    Google Scholar
  17. Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Mace, R. & Holden, C. J. A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 116–121 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J. & Greenhill, S. J. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323, 479–483 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Kirch, P. V. On the Road of the Winds: An Archaeological History of the Pacific Islands before European Contact (Univ. California Press, 2000)
    Google Scholar
  21. Turchin, P. & Gavrilets, S. Evolution of complex hierarchical societies. Social Evol. Hist. 8, 167–198 (2009)
    Google Scholar
  22. Currie, T. E. & Mace, R. Political complexity predicts the spread of ethnolinguistic groups. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7339–7344 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Pagel, M. & Meade, A. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167, 808–825 (2006)
    PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Bellwood, P. in Origins, Ancestry and Alliance (eds Fox, J. J. & Sather, C.) 19–41 (Australian National Univ. Press, 1996)
    Google Scholar
  25. Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. in The Origin of Human Social Institutions (ed. Runciman, W. G.) 197–234 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001)
    Google Scholar
  26. Wright, H. T. Early state dynamics as political experiment. J. Anthropol. Res. 62, 305–319 (2006)
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Glover, I. & Bellwood, P. Southeast Asia: From Prehistory to History (eds Glover, I. & Bellwood, P.). (2004)
  28. Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R. & Bettinger, R. L. Cultural innovations and demographic change. Hum. Biol. 81, 211–235 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Hazen, R. M. & Eldredge, N. Themes and variations in complex systems. Elements 6, 43–46 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Dennett, D. C. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life (Simon & Schuster, 1996)
    Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Green, who passed away recently, for his advice and support of phylogenetic studies of cultural evolution. We thank R. Foley and M. Dunn for their comments during an earlier stage of this research, and R. Blust and A. Pawley for comments on the manuscript. T.C. was supported by an ESRC/NERC Interdisciplinary Studentship and a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship. S.G. and R.G. were supported by the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund. R.M. was supported by a European Research Council grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evolutionary Cognitive Science Research Center, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
    Thomas E. Currie & Toshikazu Hasegawa
  2. Department of Anthropology, Human Evolutionary Ecology Group, University College, London WC1H 0BW, United Kingdom,
    Thomas E. Currie & Ruth Mace
  3. Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand,
    Simon J. Greenhill & Russell D. Gray
  4. Computational Evolution Group, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand ,
    Simon J. Greenhill

Authors

  1. Thomas E. Currie
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Simon J. Greenhill
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Russell D. Gray
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Toshikazu Hasegawa
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Ruth Mace
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.E.C. conceived and designed the study in conjunction with R.M. S.J.G. and R.D.G. collected the linguistic data and built the phylogenetic trees. T.E.C. collated the ethnographic data and conducted the phylogenetic comparative analyses. T.E.C., S.J.G., R.D.G., T.H. and R.M. wrote the paper and discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toThomas E. Currie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Notes and References and Supplementary Figures 1-3 with legends and Supplementary Tables 1-4 (PDF 744 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Currie, T., Greenhill, S., Gray, R. et al. Rise and fall of political complexity in island South-East Asia and the Pacific.Nature 467, 801–804 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09461

Download citation

Editorial Summary

The evolution of complex societies

Without high-quality data on how societies are related to each other, it is difficult to draw quantitative conclusions about the broad trends in history. For many years, for instance, the question of whether human societies developed through a sequence of incremental increases in complexity or through larger leaps has been enthusiastically debated — but with little in the way of quantitative evidence to go on. In pursuit of such evidence, Thomas Currie and colleagues have used a language-based phylogeny of Austronesian societies to test competing models of how complex societies rise and fall. Their numbers suggest that increases in complexity tend to be stepwise but that large decreases may be possible.

Associated content