The Unreliability of High Human Heritability Estimates and Small Shared Effects of Growing Up in the Same Family (original) (raw)
Abstract
Estimates of a trait’s heritability can be used to predict the advance through selective breeding in agriculture and the laboratory where researchers can replicate varieties and locations. These conditions do not apply to human populations, yet considerable attention is still given to high heritability and to small effects of family members growing up together relative to differences within families. This article shows that the conventional partitioning of a trait’s variation produces components that cannot be associated reliably with average differences among varieties and locations (“genotypes” and “environments”), let alone underwrite hypotheses about measurable genetic and environmental influences.
The critique is conceptual and methodological. It begins with agricultural trials in which varieties are raised in multiple replicates in one or more locations. The estimation of heritability and the relative size of shared versus nonshared environmental effects are examined in this ideal situation. Key shortcomings arise from: inattention to the average differences among variety-location combinations (“genotype-environment interaction”); the assumption that, all other things being equal, fraternal twins are half as similar as identical twins; and interpreting unsystematic variation as non-shared environmental effects. It is difficult to remedy the shortcomings in the constrained circumstances of human quantitative genetic research, which centers on genealogically defined varieties (sets of twins or siblings) replicated as few as two times in one or two locations per variety. An adjustment for the first shortcoming takes previously cited human heritability estimates below the fractions of the total variation given by among-location-average variance (“shared environmental effects”) and variety-location-interaction variance. Further remarks are made on the agricultural-human distinction and selective breeding.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime Subscribe now
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Falconer DS (1960) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. New York: Ronald.
Google Scholar - Hetherington EM, Reiss D, Plomin R, eds (1994) Separate Social Worlds of Siblings: The Impact of Nonshared Environment on Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar - Holland JB, Nyquist WE, Cervantes-Martínez CT (2003) Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: An update. Plant Breeding Reviews 22: 9–112.
Google Scholar - Howell DC (2002) Intraclass Correlation: For Unordered Pairs. http://www.uvm.edu/~dhowell/StatPages/MoreJStuff/icc/icc.html (viewed 10 Jan. 2007).
- Kendler KS, Prescott CA (2006) Genes, Environment, and Psychopathology: Understanding the Causes of Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Disorders. New York: Guilford.
Google Scholar - Lush JL (1947) Family merit and individual merit as bases for selection. American Naturalist 81: 241–261, 362–379.
Article Google Scholar - Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Google Scholar - Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2002) Genetics and Human Behavior: The Ethical Context. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org (viewed 22 June 2007).
- Panofsky A (2006) Fielding Controversy: The Structure and Genesis of Behavior Genetics, 1960–2004. PhD dissertation, New York University.
- Plomin R, Asbury K (2006) Nature and nurture: Genetic and environmental influences on behavior. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 600: 86–98.
Article Google Scholar - Plomin R, Defries JC, McClearn GE, McGuffin P (2000) Behavioral Genetics, 4th ed. New York: Worth.
Google Scholar - Rhee SH, Waldman ID (2002) Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin 128: 490–529.
Article Google Scholar - Richardson K, Norgate S (2005) The equal environments assumption of classical twin studies may not hold. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 339–350.
Article Google Scholar - Rijsdijk FV, Sham PC (2002) Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models. Briefings in Bioinformatics 3: 119–133.
Article Google Scholar - Taylor PJ (2006a) Heritability and heterogeneity: On the limited relevance of heritability in investigating genetic and environmental factors. Biological Theory 1: 150–164.
Article Google Scholar - Taylor PJ (2006b) Heritability and heterogeneity: On the irrelevance of heritability in explaining differences between means for different human groups or generations. Biological Theory 1: 392–401.
Article Google Scholar - Turkheimer E (2000) Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9 (5): 160–164.
Article Google Scholar - Turkheimer E, Waldron M (2000) Nonshared environment: A theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 126: 78–108.
Article Google Scholar - Turkheimer E, Haley A, Waldron M, D’Onofrio B, Gottesman II (2003) Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science 16: 623–628.
Article Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Program in Science, Technology and Values & Program in Critical and Creative Thinking, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
Peter J. Taylor
Authors
- Peter J. Taylor
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toPeter J. Taylor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, P.J. The Unreliability of High Human Heritability Estimates and Small Shared Effects of Growing Up in the Same Family.Biol Theory 2, 387–397 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.4.387
- Received: 14 January 2008
- Accepted: 16 February 2008
- Published: 20 March 2015
- Issue Date: December 2007
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.4.387